The Role of Opioidergic Systems in Breathing Based Analgesia

Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

The Role of Endogenous Opioidergic Systems in Breathing Based Analgesia

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03419858
• Other study ID #: IRB00040519
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Early Phase 1
• Start date: March 13, 2017
• Est. completion date: June 27, 2017

Study information

• Verified date: June 2019
• Source: University of California, San Diego
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this psychophysical and pharmacologic study is to determine if slow-breathing induced pain relief is mediated by endogenous opioids in response to intravenous (IV) administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone during noxious heat stimulation. We were also interested in disentangling the endogenous analgesic mechanisms supporting mindfulness-based analgesia.

Description:

The proposed study will employ a graded analytical approach to compare mindfulness to placebo-meditation and a slow-breathing exercise in response to double-blind intravenous administration (IV) of naloxone/placebo-saline and noxious heat stimulation. The aim of this study is to determine if slow-breathing induced analgesia is associated with the release of endogenous opioids. The proposed study will disentangle the specific stage of cognitive and/or respiration-based involvement (if any) of opioidergically mediated pain relief, a critical step in identifying the specific analgesic mechanisms corresponding to mindfulness based cognitive techniques.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 60
• Est. completion date: June 27, 2017
• Est. primary completion date: June 27, 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 55 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Normal volunteers with no history of chronic pain problems

• Volunteers had no prior meditation experience

• Volunteers could be male and non-pregnant females.

• Volunteers of all ethnic backgrounds were included.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Female volunteers could not be pregnant.

• They could not be taking opioids or antidepressants.

• Subjects with a repeated history of syncope, loss of consciousness, light headedness, nausea, dizziness, or vomiting in response to needles or blood could not participate in the study.

• Subject could not be using exogenous opiates for the complete duration of the study.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pain
• Respiratory Aspiration

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Mindfulness Meditation
A well-validated brief mindfulness-based mental training regimen [four sessions; 20 min/session] was used to teach patients to independently practice mindfulness meditation.
• Placebo Meditation
A well-validated brief meditation-based mental training regimen [four sessions; 20 min/session] was used to teach patients to independently practice closing their eyes and take a deep breath every few minutes.
• Slow-Breathing
Study volunteers practiced lowering their breathing rate, across four, 20 minute training sessions, in response to a fluctuating light with the guidance of a trained facilitator.

Drug:
• Naloxone
A 0.15 mg/kg bolus dose of naloxone (Naloxone Hydrichloride, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rancho Cucamonga, California) in 25ml normal saline was administered over 10 minutes. We also administered a supplementary IV infusion dose of 0.1mg/kg/hour naloxone immediately after bolus infusion ceased till the end of the experiment.

Other:
• Saline
A 0.15 mg/kg bolus dose of saline in 25ml normal saline was administered over 10 minutes. We also administered a supplementary IV infusion dose of 0.1mg/kg/hour saline immediately after bolus infusion ceased till the end of the experiment.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Wake Forest University Health Sciences	Winston-Salem	North Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of California, San Diego

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (40)

Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede RD, Zubieta JK. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain. 2005 Aug;9(4):463-84. Epub 2005 Jan 21. Review. — View Citation

Bertisch SM, Wee CC, Phillips RS, McCarthy EP. Alternative mind-body therapies used by adults with medical conditions. J Psychosom Res. 2009 Jun;66(6):511-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Mar 3. — View Citation

Borras MC, Becerra L, Ploghaus A, Gostic JM, DaSilva A, Gonzalez RG, Borsook D. fMRI measurement of CNS responses to naloxone infusion and subsequent mild noxious thermal stimuli in healthy volunteers. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jun;91(6):2723-33. — View Citation

Brown CA, Jones AK. Meditation experience predicts less negative appraisal of pain: electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of anticipatory neural responses. Pain. 2010 Sep;150(3):428-38. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.017. Epub 2010 May 21. — View Citation

Chalaye P, Goffaux P, Lafrenaye S, Marchand S. Respiratory effects on experimental heat pain and cardiac activity. Pain Med. 2009 Nov;10(8):1334-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00681.x. Epub 2009 Aug 7. — View Citation

Clarke TC, Black LI, Stussman BJ, Barnes PM, Nahin RL. Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002-2012. Natl Health Stat Report. 2015 Feb 10;(79):1-16. — View Citation

Coghill RC, McHaffie JG, Yen YF. Neural correlates of interindividual differences in the subjective experience of pain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8538-42. Epub 2003 Jun 24. Erratum in: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 20;:. Yen, Ye-Fen [corrected to Yen, Yi-Fen]. — View Citation

Cusens B, Duggan GB, Thorne K, Burch V. Evaluation of the breathworks mindfulness-based pain management programme: effects on well-being and multiple measures of mindfulness. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):63-78. doi: 10.1002/cpp.653. — View Citation

Eippert F, Bingel U, Schoell ED, Yacubian J, Klinger R, Lorenz J, Büchel C. Activation of the opioidergic descending pain control system underlies placebo analgesia. Neuron. 2009 Aug 27;63(4):533-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.014. — View Citation

Friesner SA, Curry DM, Moddeman GR. Comparison of two pain-management strategies during chest tube removal: relaxation exercise with opioids and opioids alone. Heart Lung. 2006 Jul-Aug;35(4):269-76. — View Citation

Grant JA, Courtemanche J, Duerden EG, Duncan GH, Rainville P. Cortical thickness and pain sensitivity in zen meditators. Emotion. 2010 Feb;10(1):43-53. doi: 10.1037/a0018334. — View Citation

Grant JA, Rainville P. Pain sensitivity and analgesic effects of mindful states in Zen meditators: a cross-sectional study. Psychosom Med. 2009 Jan;71(1):106-14. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31818f52ee. Epub 2008 Dec 10. — View Citation

Grill JD, Coghill RC. Transient analgesia evoked by noxious stimulus offset. J Neurophysiol. 2002 Apr;87(4):2205-8. — View Citation

Kabat-Zinn J, Lipworth L, Burney R. The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain. J Behav Med. 1985 Jun;8(2):163-90. — View Citation

Kabat-Zinn J. An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1982 Apr;4(1):33-47. — View Citation

Koyama T, McHaffie JG, Laurienti PJ, Coghill RC. The single-epoch fMRI design: validation of a simplified paradigm for the collection of subjective ratings. Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):976-87. — View Citation

Ludwig DS, Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness in medicine. JAMA. 2008 Sep 17;300(11):1350-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.11.1350. — View Citation

Lutz A, Slagter HA, Dunne JD, Davidson RJ. Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Apr;12(4):163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.005. Epub 2008 Mar 10. Review. — View Citation

MacLean KA, Ferrer E, Aichele SR, Bridwell DA, Zanesco AP, Jacobs TL, King BG, Rosenberg EL, Sahdra BK, Shaver PR, Wallace BA, Mangun GR, Saron CD. Intensive meditation training improves perceptual discrimination and sustained attention. Psychol Sci. 2010 Jun;21(6):829-39. doi: 10.1177/0956797610371339. Epub 2010 May 11. — View Citation

Martin SL, Kerr KL, Bartley EJ, Kuhn BL, Palit S, Terry EL, DelVentura JL, Rhudy JL. Respiration-induced hypoalgesia: exploration of potential mechanisms. J Pain. 2012 Aug;13(8):755-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jul 4. — View Citation

Martucci KT, Eisenach JC, Tong C, Coghill RC. Opioid-independent mechanisms supporting offset analgesia and temporal sharpening of nociceptive information. Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1232-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.035. Epub 2012 Apr 13. — View Citation

Mehling WE, Hamel KA, Acree M, Byl N, Hecht FM. Randomized, controlled trial of breath therapy for patients with chronic low-back pain. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;11(4):44-52. — View Citation

Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994 Feb;56(2):217-26. — View Citation

Price DD, McHaffie JG, Larson MA. Spatial summation of heat-induced pain: influence of stimulus area and spatial separation of stimuli on perceived pain sensation intensity and unpleasantness. J Neurophysiol. 1989 Dec;62(6):1270-9. — View Citation

Price DD. Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science. 2000 Jun 9;288(5472):1769-72. Review. — View Citation

Rhudy JL. Respiration-induced hypoalgesia: additional evidence for pain modulation deficits in fibromyalgia? Pain. 2010 Apr;149(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Feb 1. — View Citation

Rosier EM, Iadarola MJ, Coghill RC. Reproducibility of pain measurement and pain perception. Pain. 2002 Jul;98(1-2):205-16. — View Citation

Schoell ED, Bingel U, Eippert F, Yacubian J, Christiansen K, Andresen H, May A, Buechel C. The effect of opioid receptor blockade on the neural processing of thermal stimuli. PLoS One. 2010 Aug 27;5(8):e12344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012344. — View Citation

Stone CI, Demchik-Stome DA, Horan JJ. Coping with pain: a component analysis of Lamaze and cognitive-behavioral procedures. J Psychosom Res. 1977;21(6):451-6. — View Citation

Tracey I, Mantyh PW. The cerebral signature for pain perception and its modulation. Neuron. 2007 Aug 2;55(3):377-91. Review. — View Citation

Wells RE, Bertisch SM, Buettner C, Phillips RS, McCarthy EP. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults with migraines/severe headaches. Headache. 2011 Jul-Aug;51(7):1087-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01917.x. Epub 2011 Jun 7. — View Citation

Zautra AJ, Fasman R, Davis MC, Craig AD. The effects of slow breathing on affective responses to pain stimuli: an experimental study. Pain. 2010 Apr;149(1):12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.001. Epub 2010 Jan 15. — View Citation

Zeidan F, Adler-Neal AL, Wells RE, Stagnaro E, May LM, Eisenach JC, McHaffie JG, Coghill RC. Mindfulness-Meditation-Based Pain Relief Is Not Mediated by Endogenous Opioids. J Neurosci. 2016 Mar 16;36(11):3391-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4328-15.2016. — View Citation

Zeidan F, Emerson NM, Farris SR, Ray JN, Jung Y, McHaffie JG, Coghill RC. Mindfulness Meditation-Based Pain Relief Employs Different Neural Mechanisms Than Placebo and Sham Mindfulness Meditation-Induced Analgesia. J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 18;35(46):15307-25. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2542-15.2015. — View Citation

Zeidan F, Gordon NS, Merchant J, Goolkasian P. The effects of brief mindfulness meditation training on experimentally induced pain. J Pain. 2010 Mar;11(3):199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.07.015. Epub 2009 Oct 22. — View Citation

Zeidan F, Johnson SK, Diamond BJ, David Z, Goolkasian P. Mindfulness meditation improves cognition: evidence of brief mental training. Conscious Cogn. 2010 Jun;19(2):597-605. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Apr 3. — View Citation

Zeidan F, Johnson SK, Gordon NS, Goolkasian P. Effects of brief and sham mindfulness meditation on mood and cardiovascular variables. J Altern Complement Med. 2010 Aug;16(8):867-73. doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0321. — View Citation

Zeidan F, Martucci KT, Kraft RA, Gordon NS, McHaffie JG, Coghill RC. Brain mechanisms supporting the modulation of pain by mindfulness meditation. J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 6;31(14):5540-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5791-10.2011. — View Citation

Zeidan F, Martucci KT, Kraft RA, McHaffie JG, Coghill RC. Neural correlates of mindfulness meditation-related anxiety relief. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Jun;9(6):751-9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst041. Epub 2013 Apr 24. — View Citation

Zubieta JK, Bueller JA, Jackson LR, Scott DJ, Xu Y, Koeppe RA, Nichols TE, Stohler CS. Placebo effects mediated by endogenous opioid activity on mu-opioid receptors. J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 24;25(34):7754-62. — View Citation

* Note: There are 40 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in Visual Analog Scale Pain intensity and Unpleasantness ratings as a function of each respective cognitive manipulations and activation in response to naloxone and/or saline.	The visual analog scale (VAS) measures pain ratings that are assessed in response to noxious (49°C) thermal stimuli applied to the back of the right calf muscle.; Pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings will be assessed with a Visual Analog Scale. The minimum rating ("0") is designated as "no pain" whereas the maximum ("10") is labeled as "most intense imaginable" or "most unpleasant imaginable". Higher values corresponded to higher perceived pain ratings.; Pain ratings were assessed at baseline (session 1) and again at sessions six and seven to determine the impact of the mental training regimens. At session six and seven, subjects were given an infusion of either naloxone or saline to address the potential contribution of the opioidergic system in the cognitive modulation of pain.	Up to 3 weeks
Secondary	Respiration Rate Measures	A respiratory transducer (TSD 201; Biopac Systems) was placed around the chest to measure the participant's rate of respiration.	Up to 3 weeks
Secondary	State Anxiety Inventory	This inventory is a 20 question test used to measure a subject's state of anxiety. A numeric value between 1 (Not at all) and 4 (Very Much So) is provided in response to each statement. The range of scores for this test is between 20 and 80, with higher scores reflecting higher estimates of anxiety.	up to 3 weeks
Secondary	Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)	The PCS is a 13 item scale, with each item rated on a 5-point scale between: 0 (Not at all) and 4 (all the time). The PCS is broken into three subscales including: magnification, rumination, and helplessness. The total range of scores is between 0-52 with higher values reflecting more salient impacts of pain on one's day to day experience.	up to 3 weeks
Secondary	Cohen Perceived Stress Scale (CPS)	The CPS is a series of 10 temporally constrained (i.e. in the last month) questions meant to ascertain the relative frequency of stressors in one's life, ranging from never (scored as 0) to very often (scored as 4). All positively stated questions are reversed scored and then all items are summed to yield a final estimate of stress. The higher the score the higher the level of stress.	up to 3 weeks
Secondary	Treatment Effectiveness Scale	A VAS assessed the effectiveness of the study's intervention. Values on this scale vary continuously between 0 (not effective) and 10 (most effective imaginable). Higher values indicate a subject's greater confidence in the perceived treatment effectiveness.	up to 3 weeks
Secondary	Attitude Toward Treatment Scale (ATTS)	The ATTS was used to monitor a participant's impressions and attitudes about the interventions used in this study. It supplies 5 multiple-choice questions answered on a 10 point scale, ranging from 0 (not logical) to 9 (very logical). Higher scores reflect more positive subject impressions about the therapeutic interventions.	up to 3 weeks
Secondary	Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)	This is a brief self-report questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms. The CES-D is an inventory of 20 self-report items regarding depressive symptoms. Each question is graded on a 0 to 3 point scale with 0 representing "not at all" and 3 representing "a lot". Four questions (4,8,12, and 16) are reverse scored. A score of 15 or higher indicates a risk for depression.	up to 3 weeks
Secondary	Stress-Level Visual Analogue Scale	A VAS was employed to measure subjective stress ratings. Values on this scale vary continuously between 0 (no stress) to 10 (most stress imaginable). Higher values indicate higher assessments of the subject's stress level.	up to 3 weeks
Secondary	Naloxone Symptom Assessments	A numerical ratings scale was used to assess potential naloxone related symptomology after each clinical research unit session. "0" was designated as "non-existent" and "6" was characterized as "extremely strong". We measured symptoms corresponding to "dry mouth, dry skin, blurred vision, sedation, nausea, dizziness, and headache."	Up to 3 weeks