Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT02744781 |
| Other study ID # |
NITHiroshimaC |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Completed |
| Phase |
N/A
|
| First received |
March 28, 2016 |
| Last updated |
April 16, 2016 |
| Start date |
April 2001 |
| Est. completion date |
March 2008 |
Study information
| Verified date |
April 2016 |
| Source |
National Institute of Technology, Hiroshima College |
| Contact |
n/a |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
Japan: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology |
| Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study examined whether there is an association between the presence of lumbar
intervertebral disc degeneration (LDD) and the size and symmetry of the cross-sectional
areas (CSAs) of the trunk muscles in combat sports athletes. Participants in this study were
collegiate combat sports athletes. All intervertebral discs from L1/2 to L5/S1 in all
athletes were assessed using MRI and a comprehensive grading system of LDD (grades I-V). All
151 athletes were divided into 2 groups: LDD and non-LDD. CSAs of trunk muscles at the L3/4
disc level were measured on MRI.
Description:
The athletes lay on a bed in the MR imaging unit in a comfortable and relaxed supine
position. MR imaging was performed with a 0.3-T MR using surface coils with the body coil in
the supine position (AIRIS II, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging
was used to obtain sagittal images of the lumbar spine and intervertebral discs (repetition
time, 3000 ms; echo time, 112 ms; matrix, 256 × 265; field of view, 320 mm; slice thickness,
10 mm).
All MR images, taken at 5 lumbar intervertebral disc levels from the first lumbar (L1)
vertebra to the first sacral vertebra (S1), were independently evaluated by 2 experienced
orthopedic specialists in a random order using a grading system for LDD assessment. Using a
comprehensive grading system for LDD, discs were classified into 5 grades, as described by
Pfirrman et al. This system uses characteristics of disc structure, distinction between the
nucleus and annulus, MRI signal intensity, and intervertebral disc height for grading, and
has been accepted as a standardized and reliable evaluation tool for assessment of MRI disc
morphology. The assessment was blinded so as not to disclose any knowledge about the
athlete's condition, such as the subjective functional disability level of LBP. When the 2
experienced orthopedic specialists had differing opinions on disc grades, the disagreements
were debated and resolved with discussion.
The 151 participating athletes were divided into 2 groups: LDD and non-LDD. The LDD group
included subjects with at least 1 abnormal disc from L1-2 to L5-S1 of grade III, IV, or V.
The non-LDD group included subjects with 5 normal discs of grade I or II. For further
assessment, the most damaged disc of the 5 constituted the highest grade of LDD.
CSAs of trunk muscles Transverse MR spin-echo T1-weighted images were obtained at the L3-4
level parallel to the lumbar disc space (repetition time, 760 ms; echo time, 20 ms; matrix,
256 × 265; field of view, 320 mm; slice thickness, 5.0 mm). The image was traced onto paper
and the traced image was then transferred to a computer in order to measure CSAs. CSAs were
calculated using image analysis software (Scion Image Beta 4.02, Scion Corp., Frederick, MD,
USA), and grouped into 5 large areas because they had poorly defined borders. Each of the 5
areas was represented by the same CSA on the left and right sides of the transverse image
(rectus abdominis, obliques, psoas, quadratus lumborum, and lumbar erector spinae plus
multifidus). The 5 areas were summed to determine the total area. Three of the CSAs included
multiple muscles: obliques, psoas, and lumbar erector spinae). Oblique muscles comprise the
internal and external obliques and transversus abdominis. Psoas muscles comprise the psoas
major and minor muscles. The lumbar erector spinae includes the iliocostalis, longissimus,
and spinalis. All CSAs were normalized by dividing the values by the athlete's body weight.
This method was used because most of the combat sports adopt the weight category system, and
a previous study reported the correlation between CSAs of the trunk muscles in athletes
according to their body mass.
