Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1 Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Mini Plates Anchorage in Conjunction With Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device for Correction of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Growing Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Verified date | July 2017 |
Source | Cairo University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to determine if the Forsus Fatigue resistant Device appliance with direct skeletal mini plates anchorage is capable of achievement of skeletal mandibular effects while preventing the excessive proclination of the lower incisors at the end of the treatment when compared to the conventional Forsus Fatigue resistant Device appliance applied to the upper and lower dental arches in female patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 48 |
Est. completion date | December 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 10 Years to 13 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Skeletal Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion with a deficient mandible. (SNB = 76°) - Horizontal or neutral growth pattern. (MMP = 30°) - Increased overjet (min 5 mm) with Class II canine relationship. (minimum of half unit) - Mandibular arch crowding less than 3 mm. - At the time of insertion of the FFRD, the patients had to be in the "Middle Phalanx of the Middle finger" stage G or H (MP3 G or MP3 H stage) according to Rajagopal. Exclusion Criteria: - Systemic Disease. - Any signs or symptoms or previous history of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) as clicking, crepitus, pain, limitation or deviation. - Extracted or missing upper permanent tooth/teeth (except for third molars). - Facial Asymmetry. - Para-functional habits. - Severe proclination or crowding that requires extractions in the lower arch. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Orthodontic department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University | Cairo |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Sherif A. Elkordy |
Egypt,
Aslan BI, Kucukkaraca E, Turkoz C, Dincer M. Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):76-87. doi: 10.2319/032613-240.1. Epub 2013 Jun 17. Erratum in: Angle Orthod. 2014 Mar;84(2):383. — View Citation
Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR. Profile changes in patients treated with and without extractions: assessments by lay people. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Dec;112(6):639-44. — View Citation
Celikoglu M, Unal T, Bayram M, Candirli C. Treatment of a skeletal Class II malocclusion using fixed functional appliance with miniplate anchorage. Eur J Dent. 2014 Apr;8(2):276-80. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.130637. — View Citation
Cornelis MA, Scheffler NR, Nyssen-Behets C, De Clerck HJ, Tulloch JF. Patients' and orthodontists' perceptions of miniplates used for temporary skeletal anchorage: a prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jan;133(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.049. — View Citation
De Clerck H, Cevidanes L, Baccetti T. Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.037. — View Citation
El-Mangoury NH, Mostafa YA. Epidemiologic panorama of dental occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1990 Fall;60(3):207-14. Review. — View Citation
Elkordy SA, Abouelezz AM, Fayed MM, Attia KH, Ishaq RA, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):292-305. doi: 10.2319/012515-55.1. Epub 2015 May 19. — View Citation
Heinig N, Göz G. Clinical application and effects of the Forsus spring. A study of a new Herbst hybrid. J Orofac Orthop. 2001 Nov;62(6):436-50. English, German. — View Citation
Kim S, Herring S, Wang IC, Alcalde R, Mak V, Fu I, Huang G. A comparison of miniplates and teeth for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Feb;133(2):189.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.016. — View Citation
Koretsi V, Zymperdikas VF, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2015 Aug;37(4):418-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju071. Epub 2014 Nov 13. Review. — View Citation
Luzi C, Luzi V, Melsen B. Mini-implants and the efficiency of Herbst treatment: a preliminary study. Prog Orthod. 2013 Jul 31;14:21. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-21. — View Citation
Luzi C, Luzi V. [Skeletal Class II treatment with the miniscrew-anchored Herbst]. Orthod Fr. 2013 Dec;84(4):307-18. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2013070. Epub 2013 Nov 27. French. — View Citation
Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod. 1986 Nov;8(4):215-28. — View Citation
Pancherz H. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1979 Oct;76(4):423-42. — View Citation
Phillips C, Griffin T, Bennett E. Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1995;10(2):127-35. — View Citation
Rajagopal R, Kansal S. A comparison of modified MP3 stages and the cervical vertebrae as growth indicators. J Clin Orthod. 2002 Jul;36(7):398-406. — View Citation
Sugawara J, Daimaruya T, Umemori M, Nagasaka H, Takahashi I, Kawamura H, Mitani H. Distal movement of mandibular molars in adult patients with the skeletal anchorage system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Feb;125(2):130-8. — View Citation
Tulloch JF, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Jun;125(6):657-67. — View Citation
Umemori M, Sugawara J, Mitani H, Nagasaka H, Kawamura H. Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Feb;115(2):166-74. — View Citation
Unal T, Celikoglu M, Candirli C. Evaluation of the effects of skeletal anchoraged Forsus FRD using miniplates inserted on mandibular symphysis: A new approach for the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):413-9. doi: 10.2319/051314-345.1. Epub 2014 Oct 3. — View Citation
Vogt W. The Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device. J Clin Orthod. 2006 Jun;40(6):368-77; quiz 358. — View Citation
* Note: There are 21 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | correction of the skeletal Class II profile | This outcome will be detected through measurement of the mean change in the effective mandibular length and position from baseline data that when increased will result in a decrease in profile convexity. This measurement will be done after FFRD removal and correction of the sagittal relationship. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images will be used for analysis of this outcome where changes in effective mandibular length (Co-Gn) will be measured in mm |
expected average of 10 months | |
Secondary | Dento-alveolar side effects | The dento-alveolar side effects of the appliance therapy are to be detected. CBCT images will be used for analysis of this outcome where changes in the inclination and positions of incisors will be measured in degrees and mm respectively. | expected average of 10 months | |
Secondary | Angle of soft tissue convexity | Changes in the soft tissue angle of convexity will be detected by CBCT (in degrees) that contribute to soft tissue profile correction | expected average of 10 months | |
Secondary | Position of lips and Chin | Will be detected by CBCT; the position of the upper and lower lips and chin will be measured in mm relative to a frontal plane | expected average of 10 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03659188 -
Comparison Between Two Methods in the Acceleration of the Retraction of Upper Canines
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06403033 -
Mini-implant-supported Twin-Block in Treating Patients With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02428621 -
Early Treatment for Class II Division 1 Malocclusion With Twicare® and Herbst Removable Appliances
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03239275 -
Clinical Evaluation of Bio-creative Therapy for En Masse Retraction of the Maxillary Anterior Teeth
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03999307 -
Low-Level Laser Therapy and Flapless Corticopuncture Effect on Accelerating Six Maxillary Anterior Teeth Retraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03399760 -
Efficacy of Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin (i-PRF) in Enhancing Bone Quality
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03399422 -
Efficacy of Biological Technique in Upper Canine Retraction and Levels of Discomfort
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05610150 -
Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions With Twinblock Versus Myobrace Appliances in Developing Skeletal Class II Patients
|
N/A |