Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01567917
Other study ID # CRC-SNUBH-2012-01
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received March 28, 2012
Last updated March 29, 2012
Start date June 2011
Est. completion date December 2013

Study information

Verified date March 2012
Source Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Contact Keun-Wook Lee, M.D. & Ph.D.
Phone 82-31-787-7009
Email hmodoctor@hanmail.net
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority South Korea: Institutional Review Board
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has harmful effects on morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. In Western VTE guidelines, all solid cancer patients receiving abdominal major surgery are strongly recommended to receive pharmacologic prophylactic anticoagulation such as low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the perioperative periods. These recommendations are based on the high incidence of postoperative VTE development in Western cancer patients. However, there have been many cumulative data about the effect of different ethnicity on the VTE development and more and more investigators and clinicians admit that Asian ethnicity has lower incidence of VTE than Western ethnicity. Therefore, it may not be advisable to apply Western guidelines as it is to the clinical situation of Asian cancer patients.

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the common cancers and the incidence is rapidly increasing in Asia, there have been few prospective data on the incidence of VTE development during the postoperative period in Asian CRC patients. To our knowledge, there have been a few small-sized prospective studies in Asia and thus clear conclusions could have not been drawn based on those studies. Most Korean colorectal surgeons think that the incidence of postoperative VTE development is very rare based on their own clinical experiences. They also have much concern about the complications such as bleeding that might be caused by routine use of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis during the perioperative periods. Therefore, in most clinical situation, many Korean colorectal surgeons do not perform perioperative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis using LMHW. Considering these clinical situations in Asia including Korea, the uncritical acceptance of Western guidelines may be inappropriate. The necessity of pharmacologic thrombo-prophylaxis can be answered only from our own prospective study on the incidence of postoperative VTE development after CRC surgery. Moreover, current surgical trend in cancer patients is minimally invasive approach such as laparoscopic surgery. However, the necessity of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in patients receiving laparoscopic cancer surgery has not been evaluated even in Western countries. Western guidelines also cannot exactly answer whether pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is really necessary in cancer patients receiving laparoscopic cancer surgery. On above backgrounds, this study was designed.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 600
Est. completion date December 2013
Est. primary completion date June 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 20 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of colon or rectum

- Age = 20 years

- Patients receiving curative or palliative abdominal surgery (lasting = 30 minutes) (both open and laparoscopic surgery will be included)

Exclusion Criteria:

- No histological confirmation

- Patients who already have VTE (or pulmonary embolism) at the screening periods of this study

- Past medical history of VTE or pulmonary embolism

- Patients with the history of other cancer (Patients who were disease-free for > 5 years from previous other cancer is allowed to be included in this study)

- Patients with thrombophilia or other comorbidities requiring anticoagulation (i.e. atrial fibrillation or cerebral infarct requiring anticoagulation

Study Design

Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
CRC surgery
Patients will receive surgery for the treatment of CRC as routine clinical practice. These patients will be prospectively observed for the development of VTE(Group A; Doppler US cohort vs. Group B; Simple observation cohort) - Doppler US is not an intervention. The Doppler US is a non-invasive test (ultrasonography) for the detection of VTE

Locations

Country Name City State
Korea, Republic of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam Gyeonggi-do

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Korea, Republic of, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The incidence of symptomatic or asymptomatic VTE To evaluate the incidence of symptomatic or asymptomatic VTE detected by Doppler US during postoperative periods in patients with CRC receiving surgery 5~14 days after CRC surgery (by doppler venous ultrasound [US]) or the follow-up period of postoperative 1 month No
Secondary Risk factors for the development of VTE To identify risk factors for the development of VTE in this population 5~14 days after CRC surgery (by doppler US) or the follow-up period of postoperative 1 month No