Stage 2 or 3 Full Thickness Macular Hole Clinical Trial
— FILMSOfficial title:
Full Thickness Macular Hole and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Study: Randomised Comparison of Macular Hole Surgery With or Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling
| Verified date | June 2012 |
| Source | University of Aberdeen |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | United Kingdom: Research Ethics Committee |
| Study type | Interventional |
A macular hole is a fairly common problem in the retina and is an important cause of loss of central vision. The aim of this study is to determine whether, in patients with a stage 2 or 3 full thickness macular hole (FTMH), peeling a very fine, transparent tissue that covers the surface of the retina, called the internal limiting membrane (ILM) during surgery is superior to non-ILM peeling macular hole surgery. The main outcomes are improvement in vision, achievement of macular hole closure, need for re-operation, health related quality of life (HRQOL) and cost effectiveness.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 141 |
| Est. completion date | September 2011 |
| Est. primary completion date | September 2009 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Both |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: Idiopathic FTMH of stage 2-3, Duration of hole =18 months, Visual acuity equal to or worse than 20/40 in the study eye. Exclusion Criteria: Stage 1 or 4 FTMH, Stage 2-3 FTMH of > 18 months duration, Visual acuity >20/40 in study eye, FTMH related to high myopia (>6 dioptres), FTMH related to trauma, any other causes of decreased vision (ie corneal scarring, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma if central and/or paracentral absolute visual field defects present), patient unable to understand English, patient unable to give informed consent. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ireland | Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital | Dublin | |
| Ireland | Waterford Regional Hospital | Waterford | |
| United Kingdom | Aberdeen Royal Infirmary | Aberdeen | |
| United Kingdom | Bristol Eye Hospital | Bristol | |
| United Kingdom | Ninewells Hospital | Dundee | |
| United Kingdom | Gartnavel General Hospital | Glasgow | |
| United Kingdom | Royal Liverpool Hospital | Liverpool | |
| United Kingdom | Oxford Eye Hospital | Oxford | |
| United Kingdom | Sunderland Eye Infirmary | Sunderland |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| University of Aberdeen | Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government, NHS Grampian |
Ireland, United Kingdom,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | The primary outcome of the study is the mean difference between treatment groups in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) distance visual acuity score. | 6 months post surgery | No | |
| Secondary | Secondary outcomes include anatomical closure, adverse events, re-operation, distance visual acuity (VA), near VA, contrast sensitivity, reading speed, costs to the health service and the participant and HRQOL. | 3, 6 and 24 months post surgery | Yes |