View clinical trials related to Osteoporosis.
Filter by:Osteoporosis is a growing global concern, particularly as the population of middle-aged and elderly individuals continues to rise within communities. This demographic, being more susceptible to chronic diseases, poses a burden on healthcare systems. The objective of this study is to explore methods of educating middle-aged and elderly individuals about osteoporosis, aiming to raise awareness of the disease and promote informed decision-making regarding prevention and treatment options
The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of SHR-2017 after a single subcutaneous (SC) injection in postmenopausal women
Men sustain over one-third of osteoporosis-related fractures worldwide. The burden of osteoporotic fractures in older men is substantial, and men suffer significantly worse fracture-related outcomes than women. Following a fracture, men sustain greater rates of subsequent fractures, loss of autonomy, and mortality than women and the imminent risk of re-fracture is several times higher in men than in women. Functional mobility, known to predict falls and fractures, is also notably worse in men following a fracture. In the fiscal year 2007-08, the overall annual costs of osteoporosis in Canadian men was evaluated to be $910 million. Osteoporosis is primarily considered a disease of older women, and men are remarkably under-evaluated and under-treated for it. Recognition of sex and gender influences on skeletal health in men has been very slow; akin to the gap in cardiovascular diseases, where women are far less likely to receive guideline-recommended investigations and treatment. Over 85% of Canadian men who suffer from fragility fractures do not receive osteoporosis screening and/or treatment strategies. The existence of this care gap in men underscores our current struggle to overcome important barriers including: 1) men's lack of awareness of the critical impact of osteoporosis and fractures on several aspects of their lives, and of the benefits of treatment; and 2) the absence of comprehensive and accessible treatments tailored to men. Informed by the Knowledge-to-Action framework, we aim to address these barriers by adapting interventions with proven efficacy to engage men at high fracture risk in health behaviour change. The current protocol is for a pilot RCT to determine the feasibility of recruitment and retention, adherence to, and acceptability of the virtually-delivered fracture prevention intervention only. Our long-term goal is to conduct a large pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) to address the research question: In older adults at high risk for fractures who self-identify as men, does anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in conjunction with a virtually-delivered intervention that includes a gender-tailored strength training and balance based exercise program and nutritional counselling, improve functional mobility compared to anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in conjunction with an attention control intervention.
The goal of this cross-sectional case control study is to investigate the cardiovascular risk in digital osteoarthritis. This study aims to compare the cardiovascular risk between group of patients with digital osteoarthritis and control group of patients with non-osteoarthritis disease paired by measurement of carotid intima-media thickness. All participants will undergo an ultrasound scan to measure carotid intima media thickness, a clinical assessment with the rheumatologist and a cardiovascular risk assessment.
This study will be underpinned by the new MRC guidelines for developing a complex intervention with a participatory design methodology that uses evidence-based research and behaviour change models alongside COSMIN methodology for validating a measure. Research question: To what extent does gaitQ's smart cueing system improve people with long-term conditions including people with Parkinson's (PwP's) gait? Is it effective in the everyday environment? What factors are associated with good mobility? What is the impact of cueing on healthy people? Aims and objectives: To finalise the product development and evaluation comprising (1) algorithm refinement and (2) monitoring system development. To evaluate the reliability, concurrent validity, and potential for efficacy, as determined by responsiveness in response to the gaitQ product using gait data collected in laboratory environments. To prepare for market entry and NHS adoption: early economic modelling, pricing, marketing strategies, and early adopter partnerships. Design: Participatory design with testing for validity, reliability and responsiveness Participants: This will involve healthy people and people with long-term conditions affecting their movement, including people with Parkinson's [PwP]. Additional patient groups will be investigated, including stroke, and people with hip/knee injuries. Methods The Researchers will collect movement data using the gaitQ system, which monitors and cues, to both collect data and cue in the lab environment and investigate the reliability of the measure, concurrent validity of the metric to gold standard gait capture, the responsiveness of measures to the cueing system and usability for participants and clinical teams. To determine reliability, 60 participants will be invited to repeat testing on a second visit. Researchers will describe participants' conditions using standard questionnaires and their mobility and functioning. This study will be underpinned by the new MRC guidelines for developing a complex intervention with a participatory design methodology that uses evidence-based research and behaviour change models to identify intrinsic and extrinsic factors that contribute to a given outcome in a specific population.
The goal of this randomized controlled trial] is to investigate the effects of a 12-week time restricted eating (TRE) and exercise combined intervention, as compared to (i) TRE alone, and to (ii) Caloric Restriction (CR) plus the same exercise intervention elicited by the TRE group, on Skeletal muscle tissue (SMT) quantity, quality and function (primary outcome), Resting energy expenditure (REE) and cardiometabolic health (secondary outcomes), and miRNA biomarkers in postmenopausal women with overweight or obesity.
rhBMP-2 has been used to promote spinal fusion. Despite potential risk of complications, satisfied results could be obtained with low dose of rhBMP-2. Effect of early bone formation has been validated using rat ovariectomy osteoporosis model. However, whether it functioned in patients with osteoporosis remained unknown. In this study, the investigators intend to investigate whether rhBMP-2 promotes early bone formation in patients with osteoporosis after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
Poor bone health is a well-recognized but poorly understood complication in children with intestinal failure (IF) who are dependent on parenteral nutrition (PN). Previously, we showed that children with IF have decreased bone turnover markers. It is currently unknown if optimization of parenteral nutrition is related to improved bone turnover markers. Serum concentrations of bone markers (osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and c-telopeptide) will be measured in 30 IF patients treated at a multidisciplinary intestinal rehabilitation and home PN program at the Hospital for Sick Children and compared to bone markers in 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls.
Fracture risk factors have long been identified as key factors in osteoporosis and fragility fractures. The WHO recommended Fracture risk assessmenttool (FRAX) applies clinical risk factors to assess the absolute risk of osteoporotic fractures in each individual. Our preliminary study suggests that FRAX estimates may underestimate the risk of fractures in the Chinese population. In order to optimize the risk prediction model of osteoporotic fractures, a treatment threshold and its optimal cutting point were initially established based on the data of the health management Center of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University.
This is a study to improve the collaboration between primary and secondary health care on the treatment of osteoporosis after a hip fracture. In Akershus University Hospital, patients 75 years or older with a hip fracture, are offered treatment with an infusion of zoledronic acid 5mg, combined with vitamin D and calcium supplements, to prevent new fractures. General practitioners (GPs) are requested to take care of the follow-up on this treatment with annual infusions of zoledronic acid for 3 years. In the opinion of the investigators, it is expedient, safe, and sensible for parts of the subsequent treatment to be provided by GPs. If hospitals take responsibility for initiating the treatment, the investigators believe that most of the subsequent monitoring and continuance of treatment can be conducted by the primary healthcare service. Despite this, the investigators suspect that many patients do not get their annual infusions of zoledronic acid after discharge from the hospital. This quality assurance study aims to test a new system where ambulant nurses from the hospital support the GP in treating osteoporosis with the administration of zoledronic acid in the following 3 years after femoral neck fractures. Through the project, the investigators will create procedures for the administration and follow-up of zoledronic acid fitted in the setting of the GP office. The design is a cluster randomized controlled study (RCT) where the regions are prospectively randomized to either intervention or control regions. Patients ≥ 75 years, which suffer a femoral neck fracture, are identified in our Department of Orthopedic Surgery, where they are provided the first infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg and proposed participation in the study. Patients from the intervention regions will be followed by the protocol of ambulant nurse-assisted administration of zoledronic acid. Patients from the control regions are offered the usual care. Both patients from the control and intervention regions are asked to fill out a questionnaire after 1 year. The questionnaire will ask if the patient has got zoledronic acid as encouraged in the medical journal after discharge from the hospital. The primary study outcome is if the patients are offered treatment at a one-year follow-up or not. Sample size calculation estimates a total sample of 130 patients based on a minimal clinically important difference of 20% follow-up between the groups. Because of high mortality, the investigators estimate the need for 200 patients. The investigators hypothesize that the one-year follow-up is better in the intervention group than in the control group.