Ocular Hypertension Clinical Trial
Official title:
Functional Effects of Epigallocatechingallate on Retinal Function in Glaucoma
The present study attempts to evaluate the potential beneficial effects of a flavonoid, the epigallocatechingallate, on retinal ganglion cell function, evaluated by pattern electroretinogram, in subjects with ocular hypertension or early glaucoma.
Twenty ocular hypertension and twenty early open angle glaucoma patients will be randomly
divided into two groups: 1. placebo group [ocular hypertension, n = 10, early glaucoma
(n=10)], taking an oral placebo in addition to standard beta-blocker treatment for ocular
hypertension; 2. Treatment group [ocular hypertension, n = 10, early glaucoma (n=10)], taking
Epigallocatechingallate oral treatment (200 mg/day) in addition to standard beta-blocker
treatment for ocular hypertension. The patients will undergo standard clinical examination
including automated Humphrey perimetry (30-2), pattern electroretinogram recording and
measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT
stratus) at baseline, 3 and 6 months of treatment and follow-up. All patients will be again
tested at 3 and 6 months after changing, in a cross-over design, placebo with drug assumption
and vice versa.
Main outcome measure will be pattern electroretinogram amplitude. Secondary measures will be
Humphrey perimetry mean deviation and corrected pattern standard deviation, and the thickness
of optic nerve fibers measured by OCT.
Pattern Electroretinogram recordings.
Stimuli will be horizontal gratings of 1.6 cycles/degree spatial frequency, modulated in
counterphase at 8.14 Hz and electronically generated on a high-resolution TV monitor
(contrast: 70%; mean luminance: 80 cd/m2; field size: 31° [width] x 24° [height]). Subjects
fixate at the center of the stimulating field with natural pupils, whose size will be
measured, at a viewing distance of 57 cm. The subjects or patients will wear full refractive
correction for the test distance. Signals will be recorded by a standard, flat-cup, 9 mm
Ag/AgCl electrode taped on the skin of the lower eyelid. A similar electrode, placed over the
eyelid of the contralateral, unstimulated eye, will be used as reference. Responses will be
amplified (100, 000), bandpass filtered (1-30 Hz), sampled with a resolution of 12 bits and
averaged (250 events) with automatic artifact rejection. Two replications will be obtained
for each record to verify reproducibility. Peak-to-peak amplitude (in microV) of the Fourier
analyzed response 2nd harmonic will be measured.
Retinal Nerve Fiber Thickness by OCT
All patients will undergo OCT imaging (software version 4.0.1, Carl Zeiss Meditec Ophthalmic
Systems Inc, Dublin, CA) of the peripapillary RNFL. The instrument will be properly aligned
after the subjects are comfortably seated with their head and chin firmly positioned against
the relative rests. The OCT lens will be adjusted for the patient’s refractive error. The
subject will be instructed to stare at the internal fixation target with the eye under
examination, to enable the optic disc to come into the window and to be successively
centered. The Z-offset and the polarization will be adjusted to optimize the axial interval
to the OCT scan and to maximize the reflective signal, respectively. The scan protocol will
be the fast RNFL thickness 3.4 (3 circular scans consecutively performed, each 3.46 mm in
diameter, centered on the optic disc and averaged to form a mean baseline). All scans will be
acquired five times per eye during the same day, with short breaks between measurements,
under dark room conditions. Images with eye movements during scans, poor centration, poor
focus, or a signal strength less than 7/10 were excluded. The mean of 3 separate RNFL
measurements (256 A-scans each) with the best optic disc centration, reproducibility of the
signal profiles and signal strength will be used. Retinal thickness will be measured with the
location of the vitreoretinal interface and the retinal pigment epithelium defining the inner
and outer boundaries of the retina, respectively. The boundaries of the RNFL will be defined
by first determining the thickness of the neurosensory retina. The location of the posterior
boundary of the RNFL will be determined by evaluating each A-scan for a threshold chosen to
be 15 dB greater than the filtered maximum reflectivity of the adjacent retina. Various
machine-generated parameters will be used for evaluation of RNFL thickness, including RNFL
average thickness over the entire cylindrical section and average RNFL thickness in each
quadrant (inferior, superior, temporal and nasal). Abnormal RNFL measurements using OCT will
be defined as mean or quadrantic thickness values outside 95% normal limits, based on the
instrument’s normative age-matched database, that will be confirmed on at least three out of
five repeat scans. The reference values obtained from the normal control group included in
the study will be also considered. The average RNFL thickness, inferior RNFL thickness, and
the superior RNFL thickness have been shown to be the best discriminators for glaucoma by the
Stratus OCT. These three measures will be the RNFL parameters analyzed in our study. One
author (DM) will perform all the image acquisitions.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03284853 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of PG324 (Netarsudil/Latanoprost 0.02% / 0.005%) Ophthalmic Solution Compared to GANFORT® Ophthalmic Solution in Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01157364 -
Safety and Efficacy of a New Ophthalmic Formulation of Bimatoprost in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06441643 -
Next Generation Rocklatan
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02792803 -
A Comparison of Xalatan (Latanoprost) to Apo-latanoprost and Co-latanoprost in the Treatment of Glaucoma
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02471105 -
Investigation of IOP and Tolerability of Bimatoprost 0.01% and Tafluprost Unit Dose Preservative Free 15 Microgram/ml
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02558374 -
Double-masked Study of Netarsudil (AR-13324) Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02801617 -
Non-inferiority of PRO-067 Ophthalmic Solution vs GAAP Ofteno® in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02246764 -
Study of Netarsudil (AR-13324) Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02628223 -
180 Degree vs. 360 Degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Initial Therapy for Glaucoma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02993445 -
Effect of Alternate Therapies on Intraocular Pressure in Ocular Hypertension
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02390245 -
Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-Up Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02338362 -
Inhaled Corticosteroids: Effect on Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Controlled Glaucoma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01995136 -
Investigation of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Reduction Efficacy of Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02003547 -
A Single Centre Study to Evaluate 3 Ophthalmic Formulations in Healthy Subjects
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01936389 -
A Prospective Study to Assess the Hypotensive Efficacy of Rho-Kinase Inhibitor AR-12286 Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% and 0.7% in Patients With Exfoliation Syndrome and Ocular Hypertension or Glaucoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01693315 -
Multiple Dose-escalation Study of AMA0076 in Patients With Ocular Hypertension or Primary Open-angle Glaucoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01664039 -
An Efficacy and Tolerability Study of TRAVATAN® Versus LUMIGAN®
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01430923 -
Clinical Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Refrigeration Free Latanoprost
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01415401 -
Efficacy and Tolerability of AZARGA® as Replacement Therapy in Patients on COMBIGAN® Therapy in Canada
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01340014 -
Patient Preference Comparison of AZARGA Versus COSOPT
|
Phase 4 |