Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00653861
Other study ID # JULIDO-001
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received April 2, 2008
Last updated October 6, 2014
Start date April 2008
Est. completion date July 2008

Study information

Verified date December 2013
Source Allergan
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Safety and effectiveness of JUVÉDERM™ Injectable Gel with Lidocaine compared to JUVÉDERM™ without Lidocaine for procedural pain in the treatment of nasolabial folds.


Description:

Controlled, randomized, split-face study in which subjects receive JUVÉDERM™ Injectable Gel with Lidocaine (Ultra or Ultra Plus) in one nasolabial fold and JUVÉDERM™ Injectable Gel without Lidocaine (Ultra or Ultra Plus) in the other nasolabial fold. The investigator determines whether the subject receives JUVÉDERM™ Ultra or Ultra Plus per the level of correction desired; the lidocaine assignment is randomized.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 72
Est. completion date July 2008
Est. primary completion date June 2008
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Be male or female, 18 years of age or older

- Desire correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLFs)

- Have approximately symmetrical NLFs, i.e., both NLFs have the same pretreatment NLF severity score

Exclusion Criteria:

- Have undergone cosmetic facial procedures in the lower 2/3 of the face within 1 month prior to entry in the study or are planning to undergo these procedure during the study.

- Begin use of any new over-the-counter or prescription, oral or topical, anti-wrinkle products in the NLF area within 1 month prior to enrollment or are planning to begin use of such products during the study.

- Have undergone previous hyaluronic acid (HA)-based dermal filler treatments such that the total volume of HA injected within 12 months prior to study entry is within 5 mL of the recommended annual maximum volume for HA dermal fillers.

- Has ever received semi-permanent fillers or permanent facial implants anywhere in the face or neck, or is planning to be implanted with these products during the study.

- Have a history of anaphylaxis, multiple severe allergies, atopy, or allergy to lidocaine (or any amide-based anesthetic), hyaluronic acid products, or Streptococcal protein, or have plans to undergo desensitization therapy during the term of the study.

- Have an active inflammation, infection, cancerous or pre-cancerous lesion, or unhealed wound in the NLF area

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator)


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
JUVÉDERM™ Injectable Gel with Lidocaine
Single treatment, volume determined by investigator
JUVÉDERM™ Injectable Gel
Single treatment, volume determined by investigator

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Allergan Medical

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Weinkle SH, Bank DE, Boyd CM, Gold MH, Thomas JA, Murphy DK. A multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled study of the safety and effectiveness of Juvéderm injectable gel with and without lidocaine. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2009 Sep;8(3):205-10. doi: 10. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Procedural Pain Score Evaluate pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. 1 day No
Secondary Comparative Pain A 5-point scale (-2 = Right NLF more painful than Left NLF; -1 = Right NLF slightly more painful than Left NLF; 0 = No difference; 1 = Left NLF slightly more painful than Right NLF; 2 = Left NLF more painful than Right NLF). Subjects selected one category from the scale; the percentage of subjects that selected each category is presented. 1 day No
Secondary Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Severity Determination of improvement in NLF severity score on 5-point NLF Severity Scale (0 = None; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe; 4 = Extreme) two weeks after treatment with Juvederm with Lidocaine (either Ultra or Ultra Plus) in one nasolabial fold and Juvederm (either Ultra or Ultra Plus) in the other nasolabial fold. 2 weeks No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT06018987 - A Study to Assess Adverse Events and Effectiveness of HAC 20L Injections in Adult Participants for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT01012661 - Evaluation of Pain With Lidocaine-Mixed Radiesse® Injectable Dermal Filler Phase 4
Completed NCT01115634 - Autologous Fibroblast Transplantation in Facial Deformities Phase 2
Completed NCT00778531 - Protocol for the Post-approval Study of ArteFill® for Correction of Nasolabial Folds Phase 4
Completed NCT03932045 - A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of SYB Filler(SF-01) in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds N/A
Completed NCT02647853 - Phase 1 Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of TAT4 Gel in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT01069354 - Evaluation of Pain With Radiesse® With Lidocaine for Nasolabial Folds N/A
Completed NCT00797459 - Safety & Tolerability Study That Compares Restylane to Restylane With Lidocaine While Correcting Wrinkles in the Nasolabial Folds N/A
Completed NCT00850889 - Juvederm Ultra With Lidocaine Compared With Restylane for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06093321 - A Study Comparing SYB PDO Thread and MINT Lift® for Temporary Nasolabial Fold Improvement N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06295172 - A Study Comparing Lafullen15 and Lafullen for Temporary Nasolabial Fold Improvement N/A
Completed NCT01060943 - An Efficacy and Safety Study of TheraFill® Versus KOKEN for 3 Months on Nasolabial Folds Phase 3
Completed NCT05612958 - Efficacy and Safety of a 'Graft/Prosthesis, Biomaterial (DKM410)' in the Treatment of Both Nasolabial Folds N/A
Completed NCT02672644 - Non-comparative Evaluation of Facial Expressions Following Lower Face Correction Using Emervel Classic and Emervel Deep Phase 4
Completed NCT01012388 - Radiesse® Injectable Dermal Filler for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds in Persons of Color Phase 4
Completed NCT01635855 - Belotero Post Approval Study Phase 4
Completed NCT02179736 - A Post Market Evaluation After Treatment of Nasolabial Folds N/A
Terminated NCT00716443 - Evaluate Efficacy, Safety & Subject Satisfaction of Pain Management With Pliaglis® Cream for Dermal Filler Injections Phase 4
Recruiting NCT02607670 - Phase 2 Study of TAT4 Gel for Reduction of Nasolabial Folds Phase 2
Completed NCT00823069 - Safety Study That Compares Perlane to Perlane With Lidocaine (Perlane-L) While Correcting Wrinkles in the Area Around Your Nose N/A