Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Does outpatient NovaSureTM endometrial ablation alleviate excessive menstrual bleeding and improve life quality more effectively than outpatient ThermachoiceTM endometrial ablation?


Clinical Trial Description

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) or 'menorrhagia' is a common condition with a major impact on health-related quality of life and health resource utilization in both primary and secondary care. In over 50% of cases no organic pathology is present and the term dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) is used. First line treatment of DUB is medical and where this fails, surgery is indicated using either minimally invasive approaches (endometrial ablation) or major surgery (hysterectomy). Endometrial ablation has been extensively evaluated against the gold standard of hysterectomy and shown to be effective and associated with fewer complications. The technique involves destroying the entire, or a substantial proportion, of the endometrium thereby preventing cyclical endometrial regeneration and suppressing or reducing menstrual blood loss. Recent advances in endoscopic technology have resulted in the development of miniature, automated ablative systems (so called 'second generation devices'), which are easy to use, safe and obviate the need for routine unpleasant and expensive endometrial preparatory drugs10. Moreover, these devices have the potential to be routinely used in the outpatient or 'office' setting without the need for general anaesthesia. This approach is increasingly being advocated as it expands patient choice and potentially increasing safety and cost-effectiveness of treatment.

The three most commonly employed and evaluated ablative devices are ThermachoiceTM III thermal balloon ablation (Gynecare Inc, Somerville, NJ, USA), Microwave endometrial ablation (Microsulis plc, Waterlooville, Hampshire, UK) and NovaSureTM impedance-controlled endometrial ablation (Cytyc, Marlborough, MA USA). All appear to have comparable efficacy when employed as an inpatient under general anaesthesia in terms of patient satisfaction and life quality although data on direct head to head comparisons of these procedures when performed in an outpatient environment are scarce. All techniques have been employed without the need for general anaesthesia11,16-19, but only ThermachoiceTM has been reported in an outpatient setting11, without the need for formal theatre facilities or conscious sedation. The Microwave technique necessitates significant dilatation of the cervix that limits its potential for use in an outpatient setting in contrast to ThermachoiceTM and NovaSureTM10.

The newer NovasureTM system is more effective than ThermachoiceTM because inpatient studies report a higher rate of amenorrhoea (cessation of menstrual periods - 43% versus 8%). Moreover, NovaSureTM may be a better technique for use in conscious patients in an outpatient setting as it is a shorter procedure (1.5 versus 8 minutes) and associated with less post-operative pain16,19 but it does require a greater degree of potentially painful cervical dilatation10. There is thus a need for a randomised trial to compare the effectiveness and acceptability of ThermachoiceTM and NovaSureTM endometrial ablation in an outpatient setting for the treatment of menorrhagia. ;


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT01124357
Study type Interventional
Source Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date May 2006
Completion date October 2008

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02824224 - Tamoxifen to Reduce Unscheduled Bleeding in New Users of the Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT01651468 - The Effect of the Nutraceutical "Hemofix" on the Coagulation System N/A
Recruiting NCT02616731 - Oral Tranexamic Acid Versus Diosmin for Treatment of Menorrhagia in Women Using Copper IUD Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT02087228 - Evaluation of the Endometrial Cavity After Endometrial Ablation N/A
Withdrawn NCT00953641 - Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Prior to Endometrial Biopsy Phase 3
Completed NCT01436903 - Chances for Success of CavatermTM Surgery as a Function of Uterus Probe Length Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT00768742 - Safety and Effectiveness Study of RF Ablation of Uterine Fibroids to Reduce Menstrual Bleeding: the Fibroid Ablation Study N/A
Completed NCT00152256 - A Study to Evaluate of the Safety and Effectiveness of Asoprisnil in Treating Women With Uterine Fibroids Phase 3
Completed NCT00156195 - Study to Evaluate the Safety of Asoprisnil in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids Phase 3
Completed NCT00160381 - A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Asoprisnil in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids Phase 3
Completed NCT02228174 - Sonography Guided Transcervical Ablation of Uterine Fibroids N/A
Terminated NCT01969396 - Evaluation of the Goldstein SonoBiopsy™ Catheter for Diagnosing Endometrial Pathology N/A
Completed NCT00386308 - Efficacy and Safety Study of XP12B in Women With Menorrhagia Phase 3
Completed NCT00393198 - Bleeding Pattern and User Satisfaction During Second Consecutive MIRENA® in Contraception and Treatment of Menorrhagia Phase 4
Completed NCT00966264 - Hysterectomy and Levonorgestrel Releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) in the Treatment of Menorrhagia Phase 3
Completed NCT00904709 - The Assessment of Tranexamic Acid in Women With Menorrhagia Who Have Bleeding Disorders Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03670680 - Efficiency of Lina LibrataTM System N/A
Completed NCT02584088 - Ultrasound Appearance of the Endometrium Post Radio-Frequency Ablation
Completed NCT02835391 - PerClot Compared to Usual Care in Gynaecology Procedures N/A
Completed NCT02304510 - Prevalence of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Female Population Living in Beijing