Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Prospective Open Label Pilot Study Investigating the Impact of ThermaCare on Flexibility, Muscle Relaxation & Low Back Pain in Two Different Populations
Verified date | April 2019 |
Source | dorsaVi Ltd |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this Investigator Initiated study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ThermaCare HeatWraps in improving flexibility and low back muscle relaxation, and in participants experiencing pain, reducing pain during movement. This study is an intervention trial on two discrete subject samples; (1) people with recent back pain, and (2) people who regularly play sport. ViMove wearable sensors provide precise objective measurements of low back muscle activity and movement in real time and can capture a patient's reporting of pain during movement. Outcomes will be assessed through standard ViMove protocols in conjunction with multiple validated measures of pain, perception of change, and function.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | December 21, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | December 21, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 21 Years to 54 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion criteria for recent low back pain patients (Group 1): 1. Adults between the age of 21-54 inclusive, male and female. 2. Low back pain is the primary source of pain over the last 3 weeks. 3. Have experienced and received treatment for muscle related low back pain with an average score of at least 3/10 on a 10-point Numeric Rating scale over the past 3 weeks. 4. Must be able to communicate fluently in English. 5. Must provide written informed consent. 6. Must agree to confidentiality. Inclusion criteria for people who are active in sports (Group 2): 1. Adults between the age of 21-54 inclusive, male and female. 2. Participate in 30 min of moderate to high intensity exercise 3 times per week. As defined by Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale. 3. Must be able to communicate fluently in English. 4. Must provide written informed consent. 5. Must agree to confidentiality. Exclusion Criteria (applies to both Groups): 1. The subject is pregnant. 2. The subject has a severe hearing impairment. 3. The subject is cognitively impaired. 4. Known allergic skin reaction to tapes and plasters. 5. Co-morbidities of neoplasm, infection, fracture, inflammatory or metabolic disorder that has potential to affect the lumbo-pelvic region. 6. Person who is currently enrolled in another investigational drug or device study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Clifton Hill Physiotherapy | Clifton Hill | Victoria |
Australia | Peak MSK Physiotherapy | Hampton | Victoria |
Australia | Hoppers Physio | Hoppers Crossing | Victoria |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
dorsaVi Ltd | Monash University |
Australia,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in Movement Data Over Time | Collection of movement data from all participants. The results listed here depict the average change in Trunk Range of Motion (ROM) between day 1 and day 2 PM sessions | Change from Baseline movement data after 1 consecutive day. | |
Primary | Change in Erector Spinae Muscle Activity Over Time | Collection of erector spinae muscle activity data from all participants. The results provided depict the mean muscle-activity difference between the day 1 and day 2 PM sessions. Surface Electromyography (sEMG) sensors are adhered utilizing a height-specific sensor placement template. Placement is parallel with the L3 vertebrae. Evaluated in the form of the flexion-relaxation response. When performing a forward flexion movement, muscle activation occurs at the commencement of the movement (when bending down;concentric), as well as during the return to the upright position (eccentric). At maximum flexion, minimal muscle activation is expected (i.e. muscle relaxation). However, in subjects with Low-back pain, muscle relaxation is often absent. As such, the following formula is used to evaluate the flexion-relaxation response. Sum of sEMG activity at maximum flexion divided by the summed sEMG activity of both concentric and eccentric muscle activation. |
Change from Baseline Erector spinae muscle activity data after 1 consecutive day. | |
Secondary | A Change Over Time in Range of Motion in Any One Plane of Movement Compared to Pre-intervention Range of Motion. | Maximal range of low back movement in sagittal,axial and coronal planes. Results depict the change in Pelvis ROM in the sagittal plane. | Change from Baseline after 1 consecutive day. | |
Secondary | In Group 1 (LBP Patients), a Change in Maximum Pain During Movement Score, for Any One Plane of Movement. | Pain Score out of 10 as rated on the ViMove scale during movement assessment. Score from 0-10 where 10 indicates maximum pain, and 0 indicates no pain. The results depicted indicate the change in pain scores between baseline and post-intervention | Change from Baseline after 1 consecutive day. | |
Secondary | A Change in Muscle Activity From Baseline in Subjects Where Abnormal EMG Activity During Baseline is Detected. | Surface EMG measurement of erector spinae muscle activity at L3 vertebra level | Change from Baseline after 1 consecutive day. | |
Secondary | Change in Pain From Baseline | Pain Score out of 10 as measured on a Numeric Rating scale (NRS) Score from 0-10 where 10 indicates maximum pain, and 0 indicates no pain. The results depicted indicate the change in NRS scores between baseline and post-intervention |
Change from Baseline after 1 consecutive day. | |
Secondary | Observation of Self-reported Changes in Functional Status Pre- and Post- ThermaCare Application as Measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) if Subjects Scored >3 on the NRS | Measurement of disability related to low back pain. Contains 10 sections, each of which can be from from 0-5 for a maximum score of 50. 50 indicates maximum possible disability (bed-bound - or are exaggerating their symptoms). The results depicted indicate the change in NRS scores between baseline and post-intervention |
Change from Baseline after 1 consecutive day. | |
Secondary | Impression of Change From Subjects Post Intervention and/or Assessment Period Using the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (PGIC). | Measurement of perceived change in Low back pain. Score from a scale of 1-7. 1 indicates no change (or condition has worsened), 7 indicates a considerable improvement. The results depicted indicate the change in PGIC scores between Day 1 and Day 2 (intervention) |
Change from Baseline after 1 consecutive day. | |
Secondary | Observation of Self-reported Changes in Functional Status Pre- and Post- ThermaCare Application as Measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) if Subjects Scored >3 on the NRS | Measurement of disability related to low back pain. A checklist of 24 items. A score of 24 indicates maximum disability. | Change from Baseline after 1 consecutive day. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|