View clinical trials related to Limb Ischemia.
Filter by:This clinical trial will investigate nano fat grafting as a method for treating critical limb ischemia. The method involves the collection of adipose tissue under tumescent anesthesia through a separate incision in the anterior abdominal wall, followed by preparation and injection of nano fat into the tissues of the foot and leg without additional drug therapy. The novelty of this method lies in the use of autologous stem cells and growth factors, differing from current treatments like neovasculgen, which is a plasmid DNA-based treatment. The trial aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of nano fat grafting, including pain relief, the frequency of intraoperative complications, increased distance of pain-free walking, limb preservation, and mortality rates. The trial will involve patients with diagnosed occlusive lesions of the femoral-popliteal-tibial segment and chronic ischemia of III-IV degree according to Fontaine and 5-6 categories according to Rutherford, excluding those with contraindications for surgical intervention on the femoral-popliteal-tibial segment, chronic heart failure of III-IV NYHA class, severe liver or kidney failure, among others. The study design includes preoperative examinations, hospital phase activities including the surgery and post-operative assessments, and follow-up visits at 6 and 12 months post-operation to evaluate the method's safety, complications, and effectiveness based on various parameters like pain, trophic disturbances, and limb ischemia severity. Statistical methods will involve quantitative data presented as mean ± standard deviation, with qualitative traits compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. The planned patient number is 40, aiming to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of nano fat grafting for critical limb ischemia treatment compared to current treatments.
This observational multicenter study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the e-tool for selecting patients eligible for SCS for chronic pain caused by one of the four etiologies listed above in the experience of daily clinical practice. The implantation procedure and devices used will be those used in the routine clinical practice of participating centers. Since the study is observational, the use of the e-tool will not replace the routine medical and psychological evaluation in participating centers before SCS implantation. Study Objectives: Primary Objective: Evaluate the degree of agreement/disagreement between the physicians opinion and the e-tool in selecting patients eligible for spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain. Endpoint: Calculation of the probability of disagreement (πD) between the e-tool and the physicians opinion regarding the appropriateness of the intervention. Secondary Objective: Evaluate the ability of the e-tool to classify interventions defined as appropriate and highly likely to succeed; (scores 7-9) at 3 different time points: trial, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. The proportion of interventions that were successful at the trial implantation in different time points will be compared with the proportion of interventions identified as appropriate and highly likely to succeed by the e-tool. Study Period: 24 months. 12 months of enrollment + 12 months of follow-up. Subjects: Number of subjects to be included: at least 60 (total divided between the two centers) Participating Centers: - Pain Therapy Unit - ICSMaugeri, Pavia - Anesthesia and Pain Therapy SD - Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana Pisa
Compartment syndrome (CS) is a condition where an increase in pressure in an anatomical compartment (e.g. the lower leg) affects the blood supply of the tissues, leading to tissue damage. The condition is difficult to diagnose, and more difficult to determine when and how to manage it. Treatment aims to reduce the pressure in the compartment by whatever means possible. Surgical management by of CS is highly invasive and has associated risks including infection, damage to local structures (i.e. nerves), and possibly the inability to close the wound leading to the need for further reconstructive procedures. The clinical challenge in suspected CS is knowing if and when to intervene. Some cases of mild CS may resolve without an operation, and therefore intervening too soon causes unnecessary harm to the patient. However, waiting too long to operate with high compartmental pressures may lead to irreversible damage to the tissues, resulting in either a useless limb or necrotic tissue needing amputation. Current strategies for determining limb health include interrogation of symptoms, signs on examination, and serial measurements of compartmental pressures, but no absolute measurement of tissue health. As such, there is an element of clinical judgment in management and no evidence base with which to develop clear treatment guidelines. There is a need for a minimally invasive method of continuously monitoring tissue health to improve the understanding of CS and its management before significant improvement in patient outcomes can be delivered. It is proposed the application of leg "microfluidics" - analysis of samples of leg fluid - in a series of predictable clinical scenarios which simulate the threatened and unsalvageable limb. This is with an ultimate aim of developing a method of limb fluid sampling that can predict if CS is present and requires intervention.
Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is a surgical emergency that can develop in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). ACS is a type of limb ischemia, which means that the limb, such as the arm or leg, loses blood flow. Patients on ECMO can develop this condition for many reasons, but most commonly from the ECMO procedure itself. This most commonly involves the leg. Key symptoms of ACS include severe pain, loss of pulses, loss of feeling, and inability to move the limb. However, because patients on ECMO are often sedated, ACS is difficult to diagnose as patients can not report symptoms. As a result, the only available tool for diagnosing ACS may be measurement of pressures in the limb. This is normally done with a needle-device, which is inserted into the leg for a single measurement. However, a recently developed device, called the MY01 Continuous Compartment Pressure Monitor, allows for continuous pressure readings instead of a single measurement. Multiple measurements may allow for much greater accuracy in diagnosing ACS, which may result in faster time to surgery and potentially save more limbs than single measurements. This device may also be less invasive than an older method of continuous pressure measuring, which uses a needle and tubing that is 14-gauge in size. Therefore, this study aims to compare 3 different types of methods for diagnosing ACS in patients on ECMO, which are 1) Standard of Care, 2) Standard of Care and MY01, and 3)Standard of Care and 14-gauge slit catheter.
Investigators will conduct a pragmatic randomized trial to investigate the non-inferiority of restricted use of invasive arterial lines compared to standard arterial line use.
Lower-limb amputation is associated with life-altering and life-limiting comorbidities. Currently, onus is on primary care providers to diagnose, educate, and refer patients for appropriate management. Recently our laboratory has found, however, that of adults post-amputation seen in an outpatient Limb Loss Clinic presenting with comorbidities, >50% are unaware they have signs of peripheral arterial disease and/or neuropathy. Lack of patient awareness and thus, inadequate comorbidity management, may contribute to suboptimal patient outcomes post-amputation. As a first step in this research line, the proposed project will help determine if comorbidity screening by prosthetists during routine care visits for patients post-amputation may enhance comorbidity awareness, increase patient satisfaction in prosthetic services, and reduce gratuitous prosthetic service utilization. During a follow-up visit, seventy patients following a unilateral lower-limb amputation will be randomized into either a standard-of-care group or a standard of-care plus group. The standard-of-care plus group will receive clinical screenings by a certified prosthetist for peripheral arterial disease, peripheral neuropathy, depression, and high-risk for persistent back pain; patient education on findings; and each participant's primary care provider will receive screening results. The long-term goal of this research is to determine if prosthetists can maximize their utility in an interdisciplinary care team, while enhancing patient outcomes post-amputation.
Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a sudden decrease in limb perfusion due to either an embolic or a thrombotic vascular occlusion, defined as the presence of symptoms within two weeks of onset. The profound ischemia represents an emergency in which delayed treatment results in limb loss and, potentially, death. Therefore, timely diagnosis and proper treatments for ALI are important. Both surgical thrombectomy and endovascular treatment have benefits and drawbacks. Surgical thrombectomy using Fogarty embolectomy catheter has been the standard therapy because it is rapid and effective in cases of embolic ALI. However, blind surgical thrombectomy can result in poor revascularization or unexpected vascular injury in the presence of underlying arterial atherosclerosis or in the presence of subacute and chronic thrombi. In addition, thrombosis of runoff vessels is difficult to remove. Endovascular management using catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) has emerged as an alternative to surgery. It is less invasive, and does not directly damage the vascular endothelium with the capacity to clear thrombus in the small vessels. However, long treatment duration may worsen the clinical situation. Besides, a thrombus of more than two weeks does not respond well to the thrombolysis, and it is difficult to determine the exact stage of thrombus according to the clinical history. These problems may be minimized by combined treatment, which includes surgical thrombectomy and endovascular treatment.
Phase II national, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase-3 clinical trial of 3 parallel groups.
Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) is a new tool in medical imaging with proven image quality reserve. The previously observed quality reserve of Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) in lower extremity angiographies, allowed to lower radiation exposure by 70 % during DSA in lower extremity diagnostic angiographies with non-inferior image quality. The aim of this study is to apply this non-inferior image quality and use it for radiation exposure reduction in diagnostic lower limb angiography. The project would prospectively block-randomise (50:50) patients, who undergo elective diagnostic angiography into two groups: a comparator group examined by means of conventional DSA using a standard care protocol (Siemens Artis Zee, Extremities Care setting, 1.2 µGy/frame) (Group B) and a study group examined by means of DVA using a low-dose protocol (0.36 µGy/frame corresponding to 70% decrease of radiation dose) (Group A). During each procedure the investigators record radiation exposure (cumulative dosage, dose area product) and contrast media usage and procedural time then compare the results of the groups. Qualitative image review is done to compare conventional DSA and reduced radiation exposure DVA images after image acquisition. Our hypothesis is that with the previously proven non-inferior image quality, the investigators will be able to reduce radiation exposure of the participants and also staff members in everyday clinical practice.
Obliterative arterial disease of the lower limbs (AOMI) is associated with a high risk of cardiovascular events, with a linear relationship between a fall in the systolic pressure index and a risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Critical ischemia is the most severe stage of AOMI, associated with decubitus pain and / or foot ulceration. The severity of this arterial involvement involves functional prognosis of the lower limb with a high risk of amputation, as well as the patient's vital prognosis. In these patients, the rate of amputation and mortality at 1 year can reach 20%. Consequently, the goal of management in a multidisciplinary setting is threefold: the treatment of pain, improvement of the functional prognosis and improvement of the patient's vital prognosis. Revascularization should be attempted as often as possible for the purpose of limb salvage and improvement of patient survival. In the vascular medicine department, the indication and modalities of the revascularization procedure are discussed at a multidisciplinary consultation meeting. The medical-radiological-surgical expertise takes into consideration the patient's terrain and comorbidities and the technical possibilities according to the arterial damage. With the modernization and development of endovascular equipment dedicated to the hamstrings, the interventional radiology techniques in the management of critical ischemia allow the treatment of one or more arterial axes as well as a very distal revascularization in the arteries. foot with a lower morbidity-mortality compared to surgery, especially in the most fragile patients. Since 2013, the endovascular revascularization procedures performed by the interventional radiology team have been an integral part of the management of patients with critical ischemia hospitalized in the vascular medicine department. In patients with critical ischemia at high risk of major amputation and without the option of traditional endovascular or surgical revascularization, an endovascular revascularization technique for leg rescue is discussed as a last resort in multidisciplinary staff. This technique, performed by the interventional radiology team (MDP and GA), consists of an extra-anatomic endovascular femoro-popliteal bypass. We wish to describe the limb salvage rate and the preservation of autonomy in the 15 patients treated with this revascularization technique since 2013 in the vascular medicine department of the GHPSJ.