IUD Insertion Clinical Trial
— SALUDOfficial title:
Self-Administered Lidocaine Gel for Pain Management With IUD Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT number | NCT02738203 |
Other study ID # | 32825 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | Phase 3 |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | June 1, 2016 |
Est. completion date | October 19, 2017 |
Verified date | June 2019 |
Source | Stanford University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
For intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, currently there are no standardized clinical guidelines for pain management. The investigators aim to explore whether adequate pain relief is possible through self-administered, non-invasive means alone. Reducing pain associated with IUD insertion may benefit patients and providers. When patients are comfortable during their procedure, it is likely the provider can more quickly and with fewer complications perform the insertion. The investigators propose to explore the effect of a locally applied vaginal lidocaine gel in place of the standard of care pain management, no intervention, prior to IUD insertions. This is a superiority, blinded, randomized controlled trial.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 220 |
Est. completion date | October 19, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | October 19, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: Elective IUD insertion (any type of IUD, copper or hormonal); at an out-patient setting at Stanford; English or Spanish speaking, and ability to give informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Any pre-operative use of misoprostol; or use of PO pain control medication (i.e. ibuprofen or acetaminophen) prior to procedure. Allergy to study medications: lidocaine, or surgical lubricant jelly, known uterine anomaly; prior cervical surgery; and no prior use of tampons. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Stanford Gynecology Clinic | Palo Alto | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Stanford University |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | (IUD Insertion): Pain Perceived by Visual Analogue Scale (0-100 mm) Immediately Following Procedure Completion | Pain immediately after speculum removal as measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is 0-100--on the scale "0" had "no pain" and "100" had "worst pain imaginable" as anchors. A higher score indicates higher pain. | 0-3 minutes after procedure completed | |
Secondary | Anticipated Pain as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale | Pain as measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is 0-100--on the scale "0" had "no pain" and "100" had "worst pain imaginable" as anchors. A higher score indicates higher pain. | 30 Minutes prior to procedure | |
Secondary | Baseline Pain as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale | Pain as measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is 0-100--on the scale "0" had "no pain" and "100" had "worst pain imaginable" as anchors. A higher score indicates higher pain. | Immediately prior to procedure; upon arrival to procedure room | |
Secondary | Pain After Speculum Placement as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale | Pain as measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is 0-100--on the scale "0" had "no pain" and "100" had "worst pain imaginable" as anchors. A higher score indicates higher pain. | Intraoperative | |
Secondary | Pain After Tenaculum Placement as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale | Pain as measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is 0-100--on the scale "0" had "no pain" and "100" had "worst pain imaginable" as anchors. A higher score indicates higher pain. | Intraoperative |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02708251 -
Glyceryl Trinitrate Versus Lidocaine Cream for IUD Insertion
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02141321 -
Sub Lingual Misoprostol Before IUD Insertion in Women With Only Previous Cesarean Section
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03473717 -
Comparison of Pain Level During Intrauterine Device (IUD) Insertion Between Conventional and Direct Method
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05204979 -
Vaginal Vs Subling Misoprost Before Iud Insertion in Women With Previous CS
|
||
Completed |
NCT04441333 -
Usability, Safety and Efficacy of AspivixTM
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02904915 -
Paracervical Block Versus No Paracervical Block During IUD Insertion
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04046302 -
Vaginal Dinoprostone Administration Prior to an Intrauterine Device Insertion in Multiparous Women.
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04441281 -
Usability, Safety and Efficacy of AspivixTM (Comparative Study)
|
N/A |