Infertility Clinical Trial
Official title:
Pharmacogenetic Algorithm for Individualized Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (iCOS) in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles
In this study, the investigators will evaluate genetic variation or polymorphisms between individuals submitted to IVF/ICSI cycles, and how these variations influence response to COS and pregnancy outcomes. Thus, this project has the aim to develop a pharmacogenetic algorithm associating gene polymorphisms, the patient clinical information, and functional and hormonal biomarker to: 1) predict the patient response to gonadotropin; 2) develop individualized gonadotropin regimens; 3) improve the accuracy of determining appropriate dosages of gonadotrophins; 4) improve efficacy and patient compliance to COS; and finally 5) reduce the time-to-pregnancy.
Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is crucial for optimizing in vitro fertilization (IVF) /
intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) success. Multiple factors influence the ovarian
response to COS, making predictions about oocyte yields not so straightforward. As a result,
ovarian response may be poor or suboptimal, or even excessive, all of which has negative
consequences to the affected patient. The study of gene polymorphisms regulating the female
reproductive function may help to clarify the mechanisms responsible for gonadal function and
fertility, and also the inter-individual variability in ovarian response to COS.
The main objective of COS is obtaining an adequate number of good quality oocytes, and also
minimize the adverse drug reactions and cycle cancellations due to a high or poor response.
The ideal number of oocytes to optimize treatment outcomes has been subject of debate for
many years. However, based on recent published data, it seems reasonable to define the
optimal number of oocytes to be retrieved after an adequate COS as 10-15 oocytes. To perform
an adequate COS, it has been suggested that the antral follicle count (AFC) and
anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) are the best biomarkers to predict the ovarian response.
Recently, two nomograms have been proposed for the calculation of the follicle stimulating
hormone (FSH) starting dose for COS, taking into account different parameters, namely: 1)
Age, AFC and day 3 serum FSH; and 2) Age, serum AMH and FSH. Meanwhile, these prediction
models are not able to predict an unexpected poor response and also a higher and undesirable
ovarian response to FSH monotherapy.
Considering the number of retrieved oocytes, it has been recently purposed a new patient
stratification during ART treatments: poor response (1-3 oocytes); sub-optimal response (4-9
oocytes); normal response (10-15 oocytes); high response (>15 oocytes). The reason to create
this new category of sub-optimal responder is that they have poorer outcomes during ART
treatments when compared to patients that have 10-15 oocytes retrieved. This category of
sub-optimal responder has led to the introduction of new concept in reproductive medicine
with the objective to stratify low prognosis patients undergoing ART based on the combination
of quantitative and qualitative parameters. There is a group of patients that although
present normal biomarkers of ovarian reserve, such as AFC and AMH, they have a sub-optimal
response to COS. They have 9 retrieved oocytes, showing the inadequacy of using only the
traditional ovarian reserve biomarkers to predict the ovarian response. This sub-optimal
response should be related to ovarian sensitivity to exogenous gonadotrophins modulated by
genetic factors.
Hence, adoption of a pharmacogenetic approach in assisted reproduction seems attractive as it
may help understanding the relationship between genetic variants and ovarian response to
exogenous gonadotropins. The patient´s genetic profile could be used to select the most
appropriate gonadotropin type, predict the optimal dosage for each drug, develop
cost-effective treatment plan, maximize the success rates, and finally decrease the
time-to-pregnancy.
The study of genetic polymorphisms is undoubtedly a promising field in reproductive medicine.
The candidate genes that play a role in the ovarian response to COS are as follows: i) genes
that affect follicular function by exerting a hormonal effect - FSH, FSHR, V-LH, AMH, AMHR2,
ERα, ERβ, CYP17, CYP19, COMT, MTHFR, GnRH1, KISS1, and KISS1R; ii) genes that affect the rate
of initial primordial follicle recruitment in relation to the pool of growing follicles -
BMP15, GDF9, and FOXL2; and iii) genes that encode DNA binding proteins and transcription
factors, such as LHX8 and NANOS3. Variations in these genes can determine the variability of
the follicular pool and explain the variance of the COS response and the results of ART.
In modern reproductive medicine, where the individualization and personalized treatments
should be the norm, optimizing and obtaining the best result in each COS would be of great
interest to both clinicians and patients alike. Considering the variability of patients´
response to COS, it is clear inadequate to select the type of gonadotropin and its initial
dose empirically or based only on clinical and hormonal parameters.
In this study, the investigators will evaluate genetic variation or polymorphisms between
individuals submitted to IVF/ICSI cycles, and how these variations influence response to COS
and pregnancy outcomes. Thus, this project has the aim to develop a pharmacogenetic algorithm
associating gene polymorphisms, the patient clinical information, and functional and hormonal
biomarker to: 1) predict the patient response to gonadotropin; 2) develop individualized
gonadotropin regimens; 3) improve the accuracy of determining appropriate dosages of
gonadotrophins; 4) improve efficacy and patient compliance to COS; and finally 5) reduce the
time-to-pregnancy.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03607409 -
Role of Inhibin A as Biomarker for Ovarian Response for IVF Treatment
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02312076 -
GnRHa for Luteal Phase Support in Long GnRHa Protocol Cycles
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT02161861 -
Improvement of IVF Fertilization Rates, by the Cyclic Tripeptide FEE - Prospective Randomized Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03287479 -
Comparison of a Semi-automated Closed Vitrification System (Gavi®) With a Manual Open Vitrification Sytem (Cryotop®)
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03522350 -
Randomized Trial Comparing EmbryoScope With EmbryoScope+.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04496284 -
Embryo Transfer Outcomes After Vitrification With Slush Nitrogen Compared to Liquid Nitrogen
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03623659 -
pArtiaL zonA pelluciDa Removal by assisteD hatchINg of Blastocysts
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03895099 -
New Ovarian Stimulation With Random Start, Use of Progestin Protocol for Oocyte Donors
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04142112 -
Randomized, Standard-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Ohana IVF Sperm Preparation Kit, SPeRtility IVF Next Generation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03152643 -
Cumulative Live Birth Rates After Cleavage-stage Versus Blastocyst-stage Embryo Transfer
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03683771 -
Assessment of Endometrial Pattern and Sub-endometrial Vascularity in ICSI Outcome
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03161119 -
Comparing Two Different Embryo Transfer Catheters
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04108039 -
Micronized Progesterone vs Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist in Freeze-all IVF Cycles.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678558 -
Oocyte Vitrification Aided With Cytochalasin B
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678610 -
Handling Medium for ICSI With Ionomycin and Latrunculin A
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678571 -
Oocyte Vitrification Aided With Latrunculin A
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678597 -
Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Latrunculin B ( ICSI-LB)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678818 -
Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Latrunculin A (ICSI-LA)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03677492 -
Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Cytochalasin D ( ICSI-CD)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678584 -
Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Chaetoglobosin A ( ICSI-CA)
|
N/A |