View clinical trials related to Gastric Cancer.
Filter by:Gastric cancer continues to have a poor prognosis primarily due to the inability to detect it in its early stages. This study will develop and validate a blood assay to facilitate the non-invasive detection of gastric cancer.
This clinical trial will enroll subjects with HER2+ solid tumors and is conducted in two phases, which are phase 1a and phase 1b. The primary objective of phase 1 is to determine the safety and tolerability of AB-201 in subjects with advanced HER2+ solid tumors.
This trial is a prospective, single arm, single center, phase II clinical study aimed at subjects with advanced gastric cancer and para aortic lymph node metastasis, exploring the feasibility and safety of Sintilimab Injection combined with synchronous chemo-radiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy. Patients will receive sintilimab Injection (200mg iv q3w d1) combined with concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen will use oxaliplatin 130mg/m2+S-1 40mg/m2 bid d1-14. Radiotherapy is performed using intraperitoneal radiation therapy, once a day, five times a week, at a dose of 1.8-2 Gy/f, for a total of 45-50.4 Gy (60-66 Gy for lymph node lesions). Radiation therapy starts from the second cycle of Sintilimab Injection combined with chemotherapy. The subjects underwent imaging evaluation after completing 4 cycles of combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy with Sintilimab Injection. Evaluated as a surgical subject (surgical conditions: imaging evaluation of enlarged lymph nodes adjacent to the abdominal aorta with PR or no significant activity), radical surgery will be performed within 4 weeks after the last study drug treatment. After surgery, the researcher will determine the necessity of adjuvant treatment and develop an adjuvant treatment plan based on the subject's condition. Subjects evaluated as inoperable will have their best follow-up treatment plan determined by the researcher.
In our prior research, a risk scoring model for the occurrence of lymph node metastasis in patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer was established. To further validate this scoring model, a prospective study has been designed with the aim of prospectively assessing the model's clinical applicability.
Phase II Clinical Study of Adebrelimab Combined with Apatinib and Paclitaxel for Injection(Albumin Bound) as Second-line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Previously Treated with Immunotherapy
The Systemic Oxidative Stress Score (SOSS) , a comprehensive score reflecting the oxidative stress conditions in the microenvironment, can independently and effectively predict tumor burden and long-term prognosis in GC patients. Nomograms based on SOSS provide a potential and promising model for risk stratification and guiding the implementation of treatment decisions.
This study aimed to develop a novel Prognostic Oxidative Stress-Immune-Inflammatory Score (POSII Score) and introduce an innovative online calculator designed to predict long-term survival and assess the recurrence risk of gastric cancer (GC).
The goal of this study is to test a new PET imaging agent in patients with solid tumors. This tracer is made of a radioactively-labeled monoclonal antibody MNPR-101, and can show where tumors are present in the body using a PET-scan. The investigators will investigate if the new imaging agent correctly shows all tumor lesions. In the future, this method may be useful to help predict who will benefit from certain therapies. Participants will be injected with the radioactive tracer once. After injection, participants will undergo 3 PET-scans. Each PET-scan will take a maximum of 30 minutes. The PET-scans are on separate days within 10 days after injection of the tracer (e.g., 2 hours after injection plus 3-5 days and 7-10 days after injection). Furthermore, the investigators will take blood samples 6 times (5 mL each). Blood pharmacokinetics (PK) will be measured on Day 1 at 10 min, 1h, 2h, once on Days 3-5, and once on Days 7-10. The amount of radioactivity injected will range between 37-74 MBq (±10%).
This study is a prospective, single-center, observational study aimed at detecting the status of serum protein profiles at key time points in gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for advanced disease, and constructing a serum protein model for evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer. Subjects will receive neoadjuvant therapy (treatment regimen determined by the primary physician, limited to systemic therapy, with options including immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens and non-immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens). After four cycles of treatment, the efficacy will be assessed. Patients eligible for R0 resection will undergo D2 radical surgery regardless of tumor regression, while those ineligible for R0 resection will enter the palliative treatment phase (Note: Subjects are all patients who require neoadjuvant therapy even if they do not participate in this clinical study). Patients will receive regular follow-up evaluations for metastasis/recurrence and survival until tumor recurrence/progression or the last known date of patient survival (Note: Regular follow-up in this study follows the frequency of routine clinical follow-ups). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint is pathological response rate (based on Becker tumor regression grading, with residual tumor less than 50% considered effective preoperative treatment). Peripheral venous blood samples will be collected before the start of neoadjuvant therapy (blood sampling point 1 - baseline) and before surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (blood sampling point 2 - post-treatment). Approximately 3 ml of blood will be collected each time, and about 1.5 ml of serum will be obtained after processing. Serum protein profiling will be conducted to assess the expression of protein profiles at these treatment time points.
Many studies have shown a significant change of diversity and composition in gut microbiota across the gastric carcinogenesis process, particularly in patients with gastric cancer. However, there has been no analysis of gastric microbiota using the mucosal brushing technique, despites its favoring benefit in microbiota study. Therefore, our study aims to evaluate microbiota profile in patients with gastric cancer, compared to those without gastric cancer by using mucosal brush sampling. This will improve current knowledge of the potential role of the microbiome in patient gastric cancer as a future biomarker marker using brushing sampling.