View clinical trials related to Femur Fracture.
Filter by:Orthopedic traumatic injuries are considered a major health epidemic, challenged by high morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic burden. The management of traumatic orthopedic injuries is challenging and complex, with high resources utilization. Particularly, the prevalence of femoral fractures in Kuwait is 8.8%, being one of the most prevalent injuries. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a common surgical procedure for the management of femoral fractures demonstrating successful outcome for allowing minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis, early union of 93% to 100%, and low infection rate of only 0% to 2%. Yet, one of the major complications post ORIF is knee stiffness and reduced function, which brings many inconveniences to patients' daily lives, lead to disability, and could seriously threaten the functional activities of patients. The incidence of knee stiffness requiring surgical intervention is 14.5%. Particularly, the potential loss of knee flexion is 30 to 40 degrees, 13% of the patients failed to reach 90 degrees of knee flexion, and only 48% of patients reached >120 degrees of flexion. Ultimately, knee stiffness in flexion forms a major issue in distal femoral fractures. Various reasons could explain such complication including intrinsic adhesions, fibrosis and shortening of the vastus intermedius muscle. There are various surgical procedures which could be used to manage knee stiffness. However, there is no consensus regarding the ideal approach and strategy with many postoperative complications including deep sepsis, quadricep tendon rupture, skin dehiscence and infection, delayed wound healing, patella fracture, lateral femoral condyle fracture and extension lag. In contrast, dry needling (DN) is a minimal invasive intervention for the management of musculoskeletal dysfunction, and it could be used to reduce the adhesion and fibrosis between the vastus intermedius and the femoral bone. However, there is limited research investigating the effect of DN on the vastus intermedius muscle after ORIF of the femoral fractures. The effectiveness of DN was explored for the management of various musculoskeletal conditions, and a systematic review addressing DN in the lower quarter concluded that DN is an effective procedure (Morihisa et a,., 2016). In ACL reconstruction, DN for the vastus medialis improved ROM at short-term and improved function at both short and long term. DN has been proposed as a useful addition to the rehabilitation of ACL reconstructed in reducing pain intensity, increasing knee flexion range, and modifying the mechanical properties of the quadriceps muscle during the late-stage of rehabilitation. DN has also altered the passive mechanical properties of the quadriceps muscle where decrement and resistance of the vastus medialis were significantly reduced. It is hypothesized that releasing the adhesions and fibrosis of the vastus intermedius could play an important role in managing knee stiffness post ORIF of the distal femur fractures. Therefore, the aim of this project is to identify the incidence rate and risk factors of knee stiffness resulted from surgically managed femoral fractures with open reduction and internal fixation in Kuwait, and to investigate the effect of DN on the vastus intermedius muscle in improving knee joint range of motion and function after ORIF of the distal femur using single blind randomized controlled trial (RCT).
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that by allowing patients with an anticoagulant level less than 100 ng/ml to have their fracture managed surgically, will reduce the delay in surgery and therefore the complications associated. It will also demonstrate that there are no more complications with this new management than from remaining with a bleeding fracture.
Femur Fractures (PF) are nowadays one of the main social and health problems in industrialized countries. PF are defined as crack or break of the proximal femur and they represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly population. The main prospective and retrospective studies do not show the superiority of subarachnoid anesthesia over general anesthesia in terms of 30-day mortality and post-operative complications, however they always recommend the execution of PeripheralNerve Blocks (PNB). Loco-regional anesthesia plays a fundamental role in the treatment of peri-operative pain assuring better hemodynamic stability and has already fully entered national and international pain management protocols, because it allows faster recovery times with a reduction in the use of intravenous analgesic drugs in particular opioids and consequently a faster discharge and a reduction in peri-operative complications and the costs of assistance. The aim of our study will be to propose an anesthetic approach based on PNB that could be particularly suitable for frail patients especially when Neuroaxial Anesthesia (NA) is not feasible due to difficulty to position the patient or to the withdrawal time of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies.
This research study is being conducted to examine the effect of two versus one fixation device for fixation of distal femur fractures.
The goal of this prospective observational study is to compare pain control strategies in children with femur fractures. Researchers will compare ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment nerve block to IV pain control alone. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Are ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment nerve blocks as effective as IV pain control in controlling pain? - Do patients who receive an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment nerve block require less opioid pain medication than those that don't? Participants will be asked to provide pain scores during their Emergency Department stay. Participants parents will be asked to complete a brief survey at the time their child is leaving the Emergency Department.
The aim is to clinical trials compare the lumbar plexus block method with the erector spinae plan block method in terms of analgesic efficacy and possible complications. İn patients for femur fracture surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. is erector spinae plane block as effective as lumbar plexus block for postoperative analgesia in femur fractures? 2. Is erector spinae plane block effective for reducing opioid consumption compared to lumbar plexus block?
This study is a retrospective chart review of the safety and performance Standard of Care data on individuals that have previously been implanted with the femur nail of the RFNA System for the internal fixation of the femur. Demographics, medical history, primary diagnosis, mechanism of injury, type of injury, clinical and radiographic evaluation of bone consolidation, and device-related adverse events were collected. Descriptive statistics were applied to the data collected.
Most hip fractures occur in the elderly population. Opioid-related respiratory depression is more common in the elderly population but can cause severe brain damage or death. Reducing the amount of opioids administered before, during and after surgery by adding a regional block may increase the postoperative quality of recovery, reduce chronic pain syndromes, and may potentially facilitate the participation of patients in rehabilitation. Despite their potential advantages, peripheral nerve blocks are still not widely used in people with hip fractures. The primary objective of this study is to compare patients' postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption.
This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing the use of two different surgical techniques--free-hand versus distal targeting jig-based for distal interlock screw--placement and their effects on total operative time and intraoperative radiation exposure.
The fracture of the upper extremity of the femur (FESF) is one of the most common fractures in traumatology. In France, FESF affects more than 65,000 individuals per year and could involve up to 150,000 people per year by 2050, due to the increase in life expectancy of the population. The main risk factors for the occurrence of ESF are: age, gender, osteoporosis, undernutrition, gait and balance disorders. The main risk factors for death identified by the French Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Geriatrics after surgery for ESF are: a delay between the trauma and surgery of more than 48 hours, poorly tolerated preoperative anemia or a hemoglobinemia of less than 8 g/dl, absence of antibiotic prophylaxis, postoperative acute renal failure, and discontinuation of antiaggregant treatments in the case of coronary disease. Post-operative Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is one of the risk factors for mortality after surgery for ESF. AKI is an impairment of normal kidney function, and in general, AKI is a major issue in the management of patients undergoing surgery. In the short term, it increases the length of stay of patients, and the number of admissions to continuing care. AKI increases post-operative mortality by more than 50%. However, because of the complications associated with vascular filling, the use of vasoconstrictor drugs, such as ephedrine, phenylephrine, and especially norepinephrine, is increasingly common. Compared with other catecholamines, norepinephrine has been shown to be more effective in increasing cardiac output. Moreover, unlike bolus administration of ephedrine or phenylephrine, which favor the occurrence of blood pressure peaks and valleys, norepinephrine, administered as a continuous infusion, allows blood pressure to be maintained in a narrower range. The challenge is to implement a strategy to reduce their frequency. Intraoperative arterial hypotension is one of the risk factors on which investigators can intervene thanks to the "preventive" administration of noradrenaline in continuous infusion, started before or immediately after the induction of anesthesia. However, the "preventive" use of norepinephrine may favor the occurrence of AKI in hypovolemic patients (fracture and surgery-related bleeding, prolonged fasting) by reducing renal blood flow. Our primary objective is to compare the risk of AKI occurrence during a "preventive" norepinephrine administration strategy with a target MAP ≥65 mmHg compared with that observed in response to a vasoconstrictor-only administration strategy in response to the occurrence of arterial hypotension episodes. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the potential interactions of this preventive strategy with other risk factors for postoperative AKI.