Staphylococcus Aureus Resistant to Methicillin (MRSA) Screening in Trauma

Status Withdrawn

Clinical Trial Summary

The main objective of this study and to know the incidence of healthy carriers of Staphylococcus aureus resistant méti- patients supported for fracture of the proximal femur . This assessment will be made preoperatively by a nasal sampling and analysis through it by rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction method GeneXpert® .

Clinical Trial Description

There are 85,000 fractures of the upper extremity in France each year. This is a frequent pathology in fragile patients. The characteristics in terms of comorbidities, age, sex and survival are well known from the literature. While secondary mechanical complications to surgery, hovering around 6 to 8%, mortality at one year is very high (around 25%). Postoperative infection after a fracture of the upper end of the femur ranges from 2 to 8% depending on the series. This complication is responsible for morbidity and excess mortality linked to the need for revision surgery, prolongation of hospitalization and antibiotic treatment. In elective surgery, detection of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin is systematic and recommended in many countries, preoperative level of the nasal cavity. Parvizi then Goya believe that this port increased from four to nine times the occurrence of infection at the surgical site. Various epidemiological studies have shown the presence of Staphylococcus aureus in over 30% of patients. This prevalence is lower in the French population. An estimated 70% the proportion of Staphylococcus aureus in the periprosthetic infections, and 30% related specifically to the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Today there is no consensus on what to have vis-à-vis the detection of a hand and the other hand treatment of patients. The healthy carrier in the population overtake admitted to the trauma unit is unclear. It is therefore necessary to know these effects among patients with multiple pathologies. For methods of detection, the usual system and directed by swabbing and cultured with 90% sensitivity specificity of 100%. The demoyens existence of early detection as GeneXpert® Cepheid® lets get this result is in an hour with a specificity of 98% and a sensitivity of 100%. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Emergencies

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT02842710
Study type	Interventional
Source	University Hospital, Toulouse
Contact
Status	Withdrawn
Phase	N/A
Start date	June 4, 2016
Completion date	December 15, 2018

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT05552989` - Towards Better Preparedness for Future Catastrophes - Local Lessons-learned From COVID-19
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04915690` - Investigation on the Practice Status of Emergency Stuff
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03424096` - Primary Palliative Care Education, Training, and Technical Support for Emergency Medicine	N/A
Completed	`NCT02534324` - The Effect of Pre-discharge Blood Pressure of Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Hypertension in Emergency Department	N/A
Completed	`NCT00991471` - The Effect of an Physician-Nurse Supplementary Triage Assistance Team on Emergency Department Patient Wait Times	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03257319` - Inhaled vs IV Opioid Dosing for the Initial Treatment of Severe Acute Pain in the Emergency Department	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT05005117` - Laparoscopic Approach for Emergency Colon Resection	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03917368` - Ultrasound Evaluation of the Jugular Venous Pulse (US-JVP)	N/A
Completed	`NCT04601922` - Qualitative Study of Long Term Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in the Emergency Department
Recruiting	`NCT05497830` - Machine Learning for Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department (MARS-ED)	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT06220916` - The Greek Acute Dance Injuries Registry
Recruiting	`NCT05543772` - Evaluation of Blood Sampling From a Pre-existed Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Line	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT05496114` - Medical Checklists in the Emergency Department	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06072534` - Evaluation of Effectiveness of Two Different Doses of Mivacurium in Rapid Sequence Intubation	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05528211` - Safety and Efficacy of Emergent TAVI in Patients With Severe AS
Completed	`NCT05818215` - Impact of the Qatar 2022 FIFA World Cup on PED Use and Misuse Patterns
Recruiting	`NCT04615065` - Acutelines: a Large Data-/Biobank of Acute and Emergency Medicine
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04648449` - Artificial Intelligence (AI) Support in Medical Emergency Calls
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05221697` - Effect of an ML Electronic Alert Management System to Reduce the Use of ED Visits and Hospitalizations	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04431986` - ER2 Frailty Levels and Incident Adverse Health Events in Older Community Dwellers

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Staphylococcus Aureus Resistant to Methicillin (MRSA) Screening in Trauma — TRAUMASARM

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms