View clinical trials related to Emergencies.
Filter by:A randomized controlled trial of a structured conversation between clinicians and patients/surrogates to facilitate shared decision-making for intensive care use in seriously ill older adults being admitted to the intensive care unit from the emergency department.
An emergency department (ED) is a healthcare service that provides the first clinical assessment and treatment to patients with various acute conditions. These departments, however, are often overwhelmed by the large volume of patients. As a consequence, ED crowding has become a global concern and has been correlated to reduced timeliness and effectiveness of care and increased patient mortality. Concerning input, 20% to 30% of patients are brought to the ED by ambulance; the remaining are self-presenting for the vast majority. Notably, non-urgent conditions characterize a high proportion of all ED visits worldwide, and almost all of these visits involve self-presenting patients. Increasing the awareness of these patients about the mandate of EDs and the real-time situation of the neighboring emergency departments has the potential to reduce the self-presentation of patients with minor, non-urgent conditions. Such patient empowerment can be achieved through a dashboard. Concerning throughput, working in the ED requires emergency physicians and nurses to treat many patients at once while maintaining situational awareness of the surroundings. This is especially true for the head of the department, but it also holds for all physicians. It can be crucial, for example, for physicians to know if there is a bottleneck in the flow of the entire patient care process, such as a particularly high average waiting time for radiology reporting or cardiologic consultation. The availability of this information allows countermeasures to be put in place to regain efficiency. All this can be achieved through dedicated dashboards automatically fed from various information system. In addition, appropriate dashboards also enable health policymakers to monitor specific epidemiological phenomena, such as the emergence of certain infectious diseases, in a timely manner.
Study objective: Comparing the efficacy of three different preoxygenation strategies, i.e. non-rebreather face mask (NRM), bag-valve-mask (BVM) with and BVM without additional positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in three subgroups of spontaneously breathing volunteers. Study endpoints Primary Endpoint: The time taken from the start of preoxygenation until reaching an expiratory oxygen concentration (FeO2) of ≥ 90% or a maximum preoxygenation time of 3 min. Secondary endpoints: - Changes in regional ventilation within the posterior lung regions from baseline to the time when FeO2≥ 90% is achieved, assessed using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) - Difference in Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi) when FeO2≥ 90% is achieved Number of participants 15 participants per subgroup, i.e. 45 participants in total. Inclusion criteria - Normal-weight adults (body mass index, BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) with an "American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA) " score of I or II - Adults with a BMI 25-39.9 kg/m2 with and ASA score <3 - Healthy (ASA I) children aged 6-12 years Exclusion criteria ASA 3, Age < 6 and age 12-18, pregnant women, missing informed consent, signs and symptoms of an acute respiratory illness on the study day. After informed consent and a medical check-up, baseline measurements will be done for 10 minutes (peripheral oxygen saturation SpO2, ORI, regional ventilation). Then the participants will undergo 3 different preoxygenation sessions with the 3 interfaces (i.e. non-rebreather facemask with reservoir and a bag-valve-mask with and without PEEP) in a randomized order and a 20 min washout between the sessions. Each preoxygenation session is conducted in a supine position and will be proceeded until the measured FeO2 (end expiratory O2 fraction) reaches 90% or up to a maximum time of 3 min. Afterwards 10 min of SpO2, ORI and regional ventilation measurements will follow.
Background An accurate measurement of the core body temperature (CBT) is of pivotal importance in the management of severely hypothermic patients. For instance, triage decisions for or against extracorporeal rewarming of hypothermic patients in cardiac arrest strongly depend on CBT. CBT measurement with an oesophageal probe is currently considered the gold standard in hypothermic patients with a secured airway in the prehospital setting, with the tip of the probe placed into the distal third of the oesophagus (i.e., posteriorly to the heart and distal to the tracheal bifurcation). However, the correct placement of the probe tip cannot be verified in the prehospital setting, and it is unknown how incorrect placement affects temperature readings. Hypothesis and aim The investigators hypothesise that an incorrect placement of the oesophageal temperature probe tip could lead to inaccurate measurements (i.e., temperature readings not reflecting the real CBT). Particularly, a tip location too high in the oesophagus in close proximity to the trachea could lead to falsely low temperature readings, especially when the patient is ventilated with cold air. The aim of the proposed study is to investigate the influence of oesophageal temperature probe tip location on CBT measurement. Methods Experimental, interventional study on 16 healthy volunteers. During the test oesophageal temperature is measured while participants are breathing ambient air first at 20°C (baseline) followed by cold (-20°C) ambient air in supine position for 20 minutes each test in an environmental simulator (terraXcube). Each participant repeats the 20-min test two times with the oesophageal temperature probe tip placed either in the lower third of the oesophagus (i.e., correct position) or too high in the oesophagus, i.e. behind the trachea.
The purpose of this study is to learn if the Pain in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale can improve emergency pain care in persons living with dementia (PLWD). It is hypothesized that a PAINAD electronic health record (EHR) prompt that appears to emergency department (ED) staff will enable them to accurately assess pain levels and lead to better pain treatment for PLWD.
The purpose of the study is to determine if intranasal dexmedetomidine could be an alternative to the current standard of care (injectable benzodiazepines or antipsychotics) for sedation prior to computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in those greater than or equal to 65 years of age (older adults) that are seen in the Emergency Department (ED).
This single blinded parallel randomized clinical trial will be conducted on 50 patients presented to Emergency Department of Alexandria Main University Hospital who are indicated for procedural sedation. All patients included in the study will be allocated randomly using computer software with concealment of randomization in to two groups: - Group A: 25 patients will receive ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) plus midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) - Group B: 25 patients will receive ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) plus propofol (0.5 mg/kg) Additional ketamine (0.25 mg/kg) will be administered in case of inadequate sedation in both groups. the two groups will be compared as regard incidence of complications World Society of Intravenous Anesthesia (SIVA) international sedation task force to standardize reporting adverse events
The proposed study aims to evaluate a pilot emergency department (ED) digital pain self-management intervention (EDPSI) focused on improving self-efficacy, knowledge, and skills, thus reducing the transition from acute to chronic low back pain in ED patients discharged with axial acute low back pain (aLBP). The proposed research has significant potential to improve self-efficacy (the confidence in one's ability to manage their condition) which is one of the most potent factors for improved health outcomes.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about current practices for the acute neuropsychiatric management of older adults during emergency department (ED) visits. Researchers will compare current standard of care practices with implemented guideline practice to see if standardized medication guidelines help reduce the usage of antipsychotics and/or benzodiazepines during acute presentations. The main questions this study aims to answer are: - How many older adults are receiving antipsychotics or benzodiazepines during emergency department visits? - Why are older adults receiving antipsychotics or benzodiazepines during emergency department visits? - How many older adults who receive antipsychotics or benzodiazepines during emergency department visits have an underlying cognitive or movement disorder? - What effects does administration of antipsychotics or benzodiazepines during emergency department visits have on patient outcomes in older adults and adults with neurocognitive disorders? - Does implementation of standardized medication guidelines help reduce the usage of antipsychotics and/or benzodiazepines during acute presentations?
The peer-to-peer comparison means center-to-center comparison, which requires adjusting for possible differences among centers to be fair and convincing. The first step to reach this goal is to develop a predictive model that accurately estimates each patient's probability of being admitted, starting from clinical conditions and boundary variables. Such a model would make it possible to calculate, for each ED, the expected hospitalization rate; that is, the hospitalization rate that would have been observed if the ED had behaved like the average of the EDs that provided the data to build the model itself. Comparing the observed hospitalization rate in the single ED with the expected rate derived from the model provides a rigorous method of comparing the department with the average performance, taking into account the characteristics of the patients treated and the conditions under which the ED operated. In other words, the predictive model represents the benchmark against which each ED is evaluated.