Diabetic Foot Ulcer Clinical Trial
— BISILOfficial title:
A Randomised Controlled Investigation Comparing the Clinical Performance and Cost Effectiveness of Biatain® Silicone With Standard of Care Dressing Including Filler in Chronic Wounds
Verified date | January 2024 |
Source | Coloplast A/S |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
A randomised controlled investigation comparing the clinical performance and cost effectiveness of Biatain® Silicone with Standard of Care dressing including filler in chronic wounds (CP351 - BISIL Study) This study (BISIL) will compare the Biatain® Silicone dressing to commonly used wound care products (AQUACEL®EXTRATM Hydrofiber® Dressing used with Mepilex® Border). The study will recruit in total 100 adult subjects with a venous leg ulcer or a diabetic foot ulcer no deeper than 2cm. Only ulcers with a duration of at least 8 weeks but no longer than a year will be included. The study will be a randomised controlled trial where half of the participants will use Biatain® Silicone and half will use the comparator for 4 weeks. Each participant will be in the study for 4-5 weeks during which there will be a weekly visit with the study team to complete the study assessments and change the dressing. The study will run for approximately one year, starting in January 2023.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 102 |
Est. completion date | December 27, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | December 27, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Has given written consent to participate by signing the Informed Consent Signature Form - Is at least 18 years of age and has full legal capacity - Has a venous leg ulcer (VLU) (C6 of the CEAP classification(1)) or a non-infected diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) with a duration longer than 8 weeks but no longer than 24 months - Has a wound with depth1 down to 20 mm - Has a maximum wound depth1 relative to wound diameter - Has a wound with exudate levels requiring a filler and a standard secondary dressing - Has acceptance of compression therapy in case of a VLU or off-loading in case of a DFU, according to local standards - For subjects with diabetes, has HbA1c = 10% or = 86 mmol/mol, measured within the last 3 months prior to inclusion Exclusion Criteria: - Wound is infected. For DFUs, has infection severity mild-severe according to the IWGDF/IDSA guideline For VLUs, has 2 or more clinical signs of infection as defined in protocol, based on clinical judgement by investigator/tissue viability nurse - Wounds is with exposed tendons, is with bones or has fistulas - Wound is with cavity, or is undermined or tunnelling - Subject is receiving chemotherapy - Subject has ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) below 0.8 measured within one month prior to inclusion - Wound is larger than 10 x10 cm - Currently enrolled in another wound care de-vice investigation unless co-enrolment has been agreed with the sponsor |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United Kingdom | Norfolk Community Health and Care NHS Trust | Norwich | Bowthorpe Road Norwich |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Coloplast A/S |
United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage wound area reduction during the investigational test period of four weeks | Test period of four weeks | ||
Secondary | Total treatment costs during the investigational test period based on the number of dressings used during the investigation and the unit price of the products | Test period of four weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04497805 -
Clinical Study of ALLO-ASC-SHEET in Subjects With Diabetic Wagner Grade II Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03675269 -
Adjunctive Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) for Lower Extermity Diabetic Ulcer:
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04624516 -
Effect of Self-foot Exercise on the Incidence of Plantar Foot Diabetic Ulcer Recurrence
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06439667 -
VIRTUALLY SUPERVISED TELE-EXERCISE PLATFORM FOR ACCELERATING PLANTAR WOUND HEALING
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05608187 -
Evaluating Safety and Biological Effect on Wound Healing of ILP100-Topical in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06437028 -
Evaluating the Efficacy of Perinatal Membrane Allografts for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06278935 -
Lifestyle Tailored Offloading for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05024656 -
AmnioExcel® Plus vs SOC in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02202668 -
Transcutaneous Raman Spectroscope (TRS) Analyses of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01966380 -
Proof of Concept (Design Validation) in Patient With Hard to Heal Wounds Such as Pressure Ulcer, Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Leg Ulcer, Leia
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01951768 -
Efficacy and Safety of Garamycin® Sponge in Diabetic Patients With a Moderate or Severe Foot Ulcer Infection
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01657474 -
Comparative Study of Two Application Regimens of Amniotic Membrane Wound Graft In the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00389636 -
TheraGauze™ Alone and Regranex®Gel 0.01% Plus TheraGauze™ in the Treatment of Wagner Stage I Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01181440 -
Dermagraft(R) for the Treatment of Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 3 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05888259 -
Plantar Pressure Distribution in Diabetic Foot Ulcer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04054804 -
Digital Foot Check by Using the D-Foot, a New Software
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05877378 -
Efficacy of PICO Single-use System in Chronic Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06037369 -
The Short Message-based Customized Standardized
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03312595 -
Clinical Outcomes After Treatment With RestrataTM Wound Matrix in Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04564443 -
A Unique Micro Water Jet Technology Device Versus Standard Debridement in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot
|
N/A |