View clinical trials related to Deep Vein Thrombosis.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to identify and validate new imaging biomarkers allowing an individual phenotyping of patient with venous thrombo-embolism (VTE), mainly in terms of recurrence risk assessment and to distinguish provoked from unprovoked VTE. To do so, the investigators will create a retrospective imaging database including multiple imaging modalities, performed at diagnosis of the VTE.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the ClotTriever catheter in the treatment of patients with symptomatic iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
The study is a single center clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of blood circulation improvement using an investigational medical device, which is a product on the market and it's name is Ceragem Master V6, for the risk group of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and the ordinary person. The study compares before and after the application by one time application.
The ULTREC research project is designed to assess the safety of a negative strategy relying on Colour Doppler Ultrasound (CDUS) for excluding the diagnosis of a new thrombosis. The ULTREC project does not take into account the validity of the CDUS positive criteria used to confirm the diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) recurrence. The risk of considering only the negative strategy is to ignore the possibility of having an improvement in sensitivity and negative predictive value at the expense of specificity and positive predictive value and therefore to increase the false positive rate leading to an overdiagnosis of recurrence and an overtreatment, and a potential bleeding risk. In the ULTREC-ANCILLARY study, the research will aim at assessing the validity of baseline CDUS positive criteria for the diagnosis of DVT recurrence. As there is no diagnostic standard to which the results could be compared, it is suggested to validate these criteria based on the evolution of the thrombosis on CDUS performed at D90±5. The hypothesis is that an unchanged appearance under anticoagulation would be in favor of sequelae and will invalidate the initial diagnosis (diagnostic failure)
To see whether our increased dosing regimen of unfractionated heparin (UF) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in COVID-19 patients was effective at preventing thrombo-embolic complications. We did regular anti-Xa tests to optimise the dose of our thromboprophylaxis. Furthermore, we want to examine the time it takes to reach adequate anti-Xa levels, to determine additional risk factors and do a subgroup analysis. Lastly, we will study if there are possible complications of our thromboprophylactic therapy.
This clinical trial is designed to evaluate if the periodic screening for deep venous thrombosis by ultrasound of lower extremity in patients with intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID 19 impacts on mortality, ICU stay and total length of stay in the hospital, along with other outcomes.
This study aims to investigate the incidence of venous thromboembolism in people who are diagnosed with atopic dermatitis.
The overall goal of the VVIRTUOSO study is to determine the incidence of VTE including symptomatic DVT and PE after hospital discharge in patients with COVID-19 by implementing a pragmatic patient-centred prospective virtual VTE monitoring program in Canada and the United States.
Major abdominal surgery for cancer is major risk factor for thromboembolism. Patients who undergo major abdominal surgery are prone to develop venous thromboembolism, both in the early postoperative period and after hospital discharger. There are strong recommendations in the international guidelines in favor to pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Thus there is no consensus dor the duration of the prophylaxis. There are authors that suggest extended prophylaxis up to 4 week after surgery. On the other hand, there are prospective randomized trials that inpatient (short-term up to 7-10 days) prophylaxis is adequate.
This study is an extension of a planned quality improvement project that aims to promote standard of care by increasing the use of evidence-based clinical decision rules amongst emergency medicine providers in the University of Utah Emergency Department. Patient-specific information from the EHR will be used to recommend the use of relevant clinical decision rules to emergency medicine providers at the point-of-care. These recommendations will be in the form of non-interruptive alerts with one-click access to the suggested decision rules through the MDCalc Connect EHR add-on application. Specific aims of the study are to determine if 1) patient-specific non-interruptive alerts increase the use of clinical decision rules amongst emergency medicine providers and 2) an increase in the use of clinical decision rules affects provider ordering habits.