There are about 153 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel group study to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, safety, tolerability and efficacy of JHL1101 versus MabThera in subjects with moderate to severe RA who have previously failed at least 1 tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF) inhibitor (i.e., intolerance or documented active disease despite at least 12 weeks treatment according to the TNF inhibitor-approved treatment and dosage), and are on concomitant treatment with MTX.
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness and safety of a new peptide-based coagulant, PeproStat. The study drug will be applied to patients undergoing liver/soft tissue surgery, vascular surgery or spine surgery. The speed of action of the new coagulant, that is applied with a gelatin sponge, will be compared to the same sponge but with saline (a commonly used standard of care).
This is a Phase 3 multicenter study that includes two periods. Period 1 is designed to compare the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ABT-494 Dose A once daily (QD) and Dose B QD versus placebo and versus adalimumab every other week (eow) in participants with moderately to severely active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and have an inadequate response to non-biologic DMARDs (DMARD-IR). Period 1 is also designed to compare the efficacy of ABT-494 Dose A QD and Dose B QD versus placebo for the prevention of structural progression. Period 2 evaluates the safety, tolerability and efficacy of ABT-494 Dose A QD and Dose B QD in participants with PsA who have completed Period 1.
This study is designed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of ABT-494 in participants with ulcerative colitis (UC) who have not responded at the end of the induction period in Study M14-234 (Substudies 1 and 2), who have had loss of response during the maintenance period of Study M14-234 (Substudy 3), or who have successfully completed Study M14-234.
The purpose of study is to test the effect of an experimental medication GED-0301(mongersen) and evaluate its safety in patients (≥ 12 years of age) with active Crohn's disease. The study will test GED-0301 compare to placebo for 12 weeks. The study treatment is blinded which means that patients and the study doctor will not know which treatment has been assigned. Patients in this study will be allowed treatment with stable doses of oral aminosalicylates, oral corticosteroids, immunosupressants and antibiotics for the treatment of Crohn's disease. Adolescent patients will also be allowed treatment with stable doses of exclusive enteral nutrition and growth hormone. All patients who complete the study will have the option to enter a long term active treatment study.
During laparoscopic appendectomy, the base of the appendix is usually secured by an endoloop ligature or the stapler. Non-absorbable plastic hem-o-lok clip was shown as an alternative technique with which laparoscopic appendectomy was done faster and cheaper than the standard techniques. However, biocompatibility of different materials udes in securing the base of appendix is different. It was observed that stapler's clips made by titanium caused the mildest inflammatory reaction and creation of adhesions. Disadvantages of stapler's are their high price. Titanium clips made for the use in laparoscopic appendectomy are safe and effective option in securing the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendectomy. They have potential advantages over stapler, because they have the same bio compatibility, and their price is lower.
The main objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily doses of PTG-100 in subjects with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC).
A new NMT module from Mindray (Mindray Co. Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.) claims to measure 3 directional accelerography. The aim of the study is to compare the neuromuscular block of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg (twice the 95% effective dose, ED95) monitored by the NMT to that monitored by the Relaxometer mechanomyograph, and to clinically evaluate the new system for its diagnostic accuracy.
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study to compare the PK, PD, safety, efficacy, tolerability, and immunogenicity of SAIT101 versus MabThera® versus Rituxan® in patients with RA. This study will take place globally across approximately 70 study centers in order to randomize approximately 282 patients. The study consists of Part A from baseline for PK and efficacy analysis, followed by Part B from Week 24 to 52 for safety follow-up that also collects transition data.
This study comprises three sub-studies. The objective of sub-study 1 is to characterize the dose-response, efficacy, and safety of ABT-494 compared to placebo in inducing clinical remission in order to identify the induction dose of ABT-494 for further evaluation in sub-study 2. The objective of sub-study 2 is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ABT-494 compared to placebo in inducing clinical remission in participants. The objective of sub-study 3 is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ABT-494 compared to placebo in achieving clinical remission in participants who had a response following induction with ABT-494.