Questionnaires Assessing the Quality of Life of Patients Treated for Coronary Heart Disease

Coronary Heart Disease Clinical Trial

Official title:

Questionnaires Assessing the Quality of Life of Patients Treated for Coronary Heart Disease: a Pilot Study to Establish Outcome Indicators for Care Pathways From the Patient's Point of View

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03904589
• Other study ID #: CHUB-Nyangore
• Status: Completed
• Start date: October 11, 2016
• Est. completion date: November 20, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: July 2022
• Source: Brugmann University Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in Europe and worldwide. In 2014, they led to more than 4 million deaths in Europe, and coronary heart disease alone accounts for nearly 1.8 million deaths, or 20% of all deaths in Europe. However, mortality from cardiovascular disease and, especially, coronary heart disease has declined in recent decades. This has been made possible by improving the quality of care provided to patients. Several studies have been conducted to demonstrate this improvement in the quality of care, but they mainly measure the functional results of treatment, morbidity and mortality, survival and prolongation of life. However, patient-centered outcomes such as health-related quality of life outcomes (such as mental function, ability to resume activities of daily living, social relationship) are also considered important outcomes in the management and monitoring of these diseases. Some studies have shown that, even when other risks factors are controlled, a poor quality of life related to health is a prediction factor for morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. Some studies have suggested that health-related quality of life should be strongly associated with lifestyle, co-morbidities, and mental function. Some factors have been identified as factors that may affect the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease, including depression, anxiety, dyspnea and angina pectoris. Depression and anxiety were negatively associated with health-related quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease. As for dyspnea, it has been shown that in stable patients who have had a myocardial infarction, its increase at 1 month after initiation of treatment is strongly associated with a decrease in the quality of life and with an increased risk of re-hospitalization and death. It is therefore important to measure these factors when the quality of life is assessed in patients with coronary heart disease. The importance of assessing quality of life is that the clinician and the patient often have different concerns: what the clinician considers to be a "successful procedure" is not always considered as such by the patient. Results related to quality of life (results rarely evaluated) are among the results that really interest the patient. Indeed, many patients consider the quality of additional years of life acquired as important as the lifespan, so the goal of today's medicine is to improve the quantity and quality of life of the additional years of life acquired. To ensure this improvement, the assessment of health-related quality of life should be integrated into the daily clinical practice of coronary heart disease management. The objective of our study is to evaluate the feasibility of this practice throughout the traject of care, by using several standardized questionnaires.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 201
• Est. completion date: November 20, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: November 20, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

Confirmed coronary disease Exclusion Criteria: Emergencies, patients lost to follow-up.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Coronary Artery Disease
• Coronary Disease
• Coronary Heart Disease
• Heart Diseases
• Myocardial Ischemia

Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
• Quality of Life assessment
Quality of life will be assessed by means of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Belgium	CHU Brugmann	Brussels

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
José Castro

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7)	Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), validated and specific questionnaire of angina pectoris which deals with 5 dimensions of quality of life: physical limits, stability of angina, frequency of angina, perception of the disease, satisfaction with the treatment. Each domain has a score calculated on a scale of 0 (= worst health quality) to 100 (= best health quality).	Baseline - at hospital admission
Primary	Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7)	Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), validated and specific questionnaire of angina pectoris which deals with 5 dimensions of quality of life: physical limits, stability of angina, frequency of angina, perception of the disease, satisfaction with the treatment. Each domain has a score calculated on a scale of 0 (= worst health quality) to 100 (= best health quality).	1 month after hospital admission
Primary	Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7)	Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), validated and specific questionnaire of angina pectoris which deals with 5 dimensions of quality of life: physical limits, stability of angina, frequency of angina, perception of the disease, satisfaction with the treatment. Each domain has a score calculated on a scale of 0 (= worst health quality) to 100 (= best health quality).	6 months after hospital admission
Primary	Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2)	Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) questionnaire used to assess depression. The score is calculated on a scale of 0 (= low possibility of having symptoms related to depression) to 6 (= high possibility of having symptoms related to depression).	Baseline - at hospital admission
Primary	Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2)	Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) questionnaire used to assess depression. The score is calculated on a scale of 0 (= low possibility of having symptoms related to depression) to 6 (= high possibility of having symptoms related to depression).	1 month after hospital admission
Primary	Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2)	Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) questionnaire used to assess depression. The score is calculated on a scale of 0 (= low possibility of having symptoms related to depression) to 6 (= high possibility of having symptoms related to depression).	6 months after hospital admission
Secondary	Rose Dyspnea Score	The Rose Dyspnea Scale is a four-item questionnaire that assesses a patients' dyspnea level with common activities. One point is assigned to each activity associated with dyspnea. Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no dyspnea with activity and 4 indicates significant limitations due to dyspnea.	Baseline - at hospital admission
Secondary	Rose Dyspnea Score	The Rose Dyspnea Scale is a four-item questionnaire that assesses a patients' dyspnea level with common activities. One point is assigned to each activity associated with dyspnea. Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no dyspnea with activity and 4 indicates significant limitations due to dyspnea.	1 month after hospital admission
Secondary	Rose Dyspnea Score	The Rose Dyspnea Scale is a four-item questionnaire that assesses a patients' dyspnea level with common activities. One point is assigned to each activity associated with dyspnea. Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no dyspnea with activity and 4 indicates significant limitations due to dyspnea.	6 months after hospital admission
Secondary	Percentage of autonomous filling	Percentage of questionnaires filled autonomously by the patient	6 months after hospital admission
Secondary	Percentage of compliance	Percentage of questionnaires filled by the patient	6 months after hospital admission
Secondary	Average filling time per questionnaire	Average time (in minutes) the patients need to fill one questionnaire	6 months after hospital admission