Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02552238
Other study ID # BR1-142
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date October 12, 2015
Est. completion date February 25, 2018

Study information

Verified date August 2018
Source Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Lumason-enhanced dobutamine stress echo (DSE) in subjects having a suboptimal left ventricular endocardial border delineation (LV EBD) at rest and who were scheduled for coronary angiography.


Description:

The study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of Lumason at improving the visualization of the LV EBD during pharmacologic stress echocardiography examinations and for detection or exclusion of the coronary artery disease (CAD). The study population consisted of adult subjects referred for pharmacological stress echocardiography and with suboptimal image quality during unenhanced ultrasound imaging at rest who had known or suspected CAD. Subjects enrolled in the study represented subjects who could benefit most from CEUS stress echocardiography.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 174
Est. completion date February 25, 2018
Est. primary completion date June 22, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Provided written Informed Consent and comply with protocol requirements; - Was at least 18 years of age; - Had suspected of having CAD and undergoing coronary angiography within 6 months after the LUMASON DSE. - Had undergone a previous echocardiography prior to enrollment; resulting in suboptimal unenhanced images at rest, defined as = 2 suboptimal adjacent segments in any apical view. Exclusion Criteria: • Was a pregnant or lactating female. Exclude the possibility of pregnancy: by testing on site at the institution (serum or urine ßHCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of LUMASON administration(s), by surgical history (e.g., tubal ligation or hysterectomy), post menopausal with a minimum 1 year without menses; - Had any known hypersensitivity to 1 or more ingredients of LUMASON (sulfur hexafluoride or to any components of LUMASON); - Had any known hypersensitivity to dobutamine; - Had an ongoing or recent (within the last 30 days) acute myocardial infarction; - Had known right-to-left, bidirectional or transient cardiac shunt (ruled out with agitated saline study performed before administration of LUMASON); - Had electrolyte (especially potassium and magnesium) abnormalities; - Had unstable pulmonary and/or systemic hemodynamic conditions e.g.: decompensated or inadequately controlled congestive heart failure (NYHA Class IV); - hypovolemia; - uncontrolled hypertension, i.e. resting systolic blood pressure >200 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg; - unstable angina; - acute coronary syndrome; - aortic dissection; - acute pericarditis, - myocarditis, or endocarditis; - stenosis of the main left coronary artery; - hemodynamically significant outflow obstruction of the left ventricle, including hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; - hemodynamically significant cardiac valvular defect; - acute pulmonary embolism; - Had uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias; - Had significant disturbance in conduction; - Had hypertrophic subaortic stenosis; - Had an acute illness (e.g., infections, hyperthyroidism, or severe anemia); - Was previously entered into this study or received an investigational compound within 30 days before admission into this study; - Had been treated with any other contrast agent either intravascularly or orally within 48 hours of the first LUMASON administration; - Had any medical condition or other circumstances which would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completing the study and/or postdose follow-up examinations; In addition, due to the use of Atropine in subjects who had not reached targeted heart rate with peak dobutamine infusion, subjects with the following were excluded: - Glaucoma; - Pyloric stenosis; - Prostatic hypertrophy.

Study Design


Intervention

Drug:
Lumason
Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride-type A microspheres) an ultrasound contrast agent was administered as 2 single 2-mL IV injections during rest and stress echocardiography

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Unité de Pathologie Cardio-Vasculaire / Cardiologie Bruxelles
Belgium Antwerp University Hospital Edegem
Canada St. Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario
United Kingdom Northwick Park Hospital Harrow Middlesex
United Kingdom Hammersmith Hospital London
United States Duke University Medical Center Cardiac Diagnostic Unit Durham North Carolina
United States University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston Galveston Texas
United States Homestead Cardiac and Vein Center Homestead Florida
United States Ochsner Clinic Foundation New Orleans Louisiana
United States University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Nebraska
United States St. Louis University Hospital Saint Louis Missouri
United States Coastal Multi-Specialty Research, Coastal Heart Medical Group Santa Ana California
United States Alfieri Cardiology Wilmington Delaware

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Belgium,  Canada,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Sensitivity and Specificity of Lumason Enhanced Dobutamine Stress Echo (DSE) for Detection or Exclusion of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) The diagnostic performance of the echocardiographic images was compared to the truth standard to determine sensitivity and specificity. A diagnosis of CAD was determined for both the echo images and truth standard (positive diagnosis for CAD is defined as >/= 50% stenosis of any vessel on coronary angiography or if no coronary angiography was performed the occurence of a cardiac event based on clinical information for up to 6 months post dose; otherwise the diagnosis was negative).
Results for sensitivity and specificity are reflected based on difference between contrast enhanced stress echo and unenhanced stress echo. Results for analysis of data based on majority assessment from the three off-site blinded readers are presented.
Sensitivity and specificity are the percentages of correctly diagnosed subjects by stress echo over the total positive and negative subjects according to the truth standard respectively.
Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography were performed
Primary Reader-Specific Percentages of Participants Identified as Having a Critical Shift From Suboptimal to Optimal Echocardiographic Images The percentage of subjects with suboptimal images (defined as >= 2 adjacent segments with inadequate LV EBD in any of the 3 apical views) at unenhanced stress echo converted to adequate (reduction of suboptimal segments in any of the 3 apical views) at contrast-enhanced stress echo Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed
Secondary Change in Total LV EBD Measured as the change in the total LV EBD score based on the 17 segments, from peak stress unenhanced vs. peak stress contrast-enhanced. Total LV EBD score ranges from 0 to 34 and higher score is better outcome. Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed
Secondary Number of Participants With Adverse Events To obtain safety data in subjects administered Lumason during echocardiography 72 hours post dose
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06030596 - SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
Completed NCT04080700 - Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
Recruiting NCT03810599 - Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06002932 - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06032572 - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE) N/A
Recruiting NCT05308719 - Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT04242134 - Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions N/A
Completed NCT04556994 - Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT05846893 - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT06027788 - CTSN Embolic Protection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05023629 - STunning After Balloon Occlusion N/A
Completed NCT04941560 - Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
Completed NCT04006288 - Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT01860274 - Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST N/A
Recruiting NCT06174090 - The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients N/A
Completed NCT03968809 - Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Recruiting NCT05065073 - Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography Phase 4
Completed NCT05096442 - Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions N/A