Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02892721
Other study ID # RD16/055
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date April 20, 2017
Est. completion date March 31, 2020

Study information

Verified date August 2019
Source London North West Healthcare NHS Trust
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important United Kingdom healthcare issue affecting 1 in 20 individuals, half of whom will die from the disease. Late presentation of CRC has a poor prognosis, whereas excellent cure rates (>95%) are seen in those who present early. Accurate and early diagnosis of CRC is therefore crucial. In most patients this is achieved via colonoscopy, a camera test which is widely available and allows tissue samples to be taken of any abnormalities seen during the procedure. However, a non-invasive alternative is Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC) which uses X-rays to produce images of the large bowel which are then interpreted by Radiologists. CTC has high sensitivity for the diagnosis of CRC (comparable to colonoscopy) and the cancer precursor - adenomatous polyps.

Unlike colonoscopy, however, there is no accreditation process for CTC and there is no infrastructure to ensure that all reporting Radiologists are able to do so adequately and, as a result, there is a wide range of diagnostic accuracy. There are no universally-accepted standards to monitor quality or assess diagnostic performance, partly because we do not know what the quality markers are and there is currently no system to quantify them. Overall, this contributes to low cancer detection rates, missed cancers and inequity for patients across the National Health Service (NHS).

This study aims to assess the impact of a structured training programme with assessment and feedback on NHS radiologist performance. If the impact is positive and results in significantly improved performance, then such a scheme could be adopted into an accreditation programme for CTC in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP).


Description:

CT Colonography is a test which can can detect early cancer accurately, however, unlike colonoscopy (or mammography in breast cancer screening) there is currently no formalised program to help ensure Radiologists interpret CTC accurately. Colonoscopists are highly regulated, must be accredited and have ongoing quality assurance metrics, based on evidence linking these to clinical outcomes. Conversely, for CTC in the United Kingdom, there is no accreditation process, little regulatory oversight and no universally-accepted metrics to monitor quality or diagnostic performance.

Radiologists who interpret CTC images are often inexperienced; one-third have interpreted <300 cases in total and 20% report <100 cases per annum (the minimum recommendation). Futhermore, in clinical practice across the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (NHS BCSP) CTC may have up to a 50% lower cancer and polyp detection rate than colonoscopy. Missed abnormalities at CTC are likely to underpin this difference, as centres with highly experienced radiologists (>1000 cases) using 3-dimensional interpretation have significantly higher detection rates.

There is a Quality Assurance (QA) framework for the NHS BCSP (with an overseeing QA Committee for Radiology) but recommendations are largely based on opinion rather than evidence and any radiologist can report CTC, without accreditation; a fact which our patient representatives find extremely disappointing.

Prior to wide-scale implementation of a possible accreditation programme and to justify both financial and human resource, Public Health England and the British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists have mandated that such a program is scientifically proven to improve Radiologist performance. Consequently, this project will investigate training and assessment methods to improve diagnostic accuracy and elucidate the factors associated with higher Radiologist sensitivity.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 139
Est. completion date March 31, 2020
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- National Health Service (NHS) Consultant Radiologists or final year Registrars or Fellows in the England or Wales who currently routinely report CT colonography scans.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Radiologists who do not routinely report CT colonography scans.

This study is limited to NHS staff and does not involve any patients.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Training with feedback
One-day workshop of face to face training, comprising a mixture of theory and real-world CTC cases. Radiologists will complete four interpretation assessments lasting 2 to 3 hours: one set of 10 CTC cases immediately prior to training and a further test set of 10 immediately after, with tests repeated at 6 and 12 months (using different CTC cases for each set). Radiologists will be asked to identify colorectal cancer and polyps on the scans and complete an online answer form, including questions regarding diagnostic confidence, site of abnormality and management. The intervention group will receive online, confidential, individualised feedback after each test, which will include a case by case breakdown of their performance with explanatory answers and learning points.

Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom LNW Healthcare NHS Trust Harrow Middlx

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
London North West Healthcare NHS Trust University College London Hospitals

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (9)

Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, Kralj-Hans I, von Wagner C, Edwards R, Yao G, Kay C, Burling D, Faiz O, Teare J, Lilford RJ, Morton D, Wardle J, Halligan S; SIGGAR investigators. Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2013 Apr 6;381(9873):1194-202. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62186-2. Epub 2013 Feb 14. — View Citation

Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, Taylor SA, Burling D, Roddie M, Honeyfield L, McQuillan J, Amin H, Dehmeshki J. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology. 2006 Dec;131(6):1690-9. Epub 2006 Oct 1. — View Citation

Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, Heiken JP, Dachman A, Kuo MD, Menias CO, Siewert B, Cheema JI, Obregon RG, Fidler JL, Zimmerman P, Horton KM, Coakley K, Iyer RB, Hara AK, Halvorsen RA Jr, Casola G, Yee J, Herman BA, Burgart LJ, Limburg PJ. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 18;359(12):1207-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800996. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 25;359(26):2853. — View Citation

McCoubrie P. Metrics in medical education. Ulster Med J. 2010 May;79(2):52-6. Review. — View Citation

Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2191-200. Epub 2003 Dec 1. — View Citation

Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, Marmo R. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):393-405. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101887. Epub 2011 Mar 17. Review. — View Citation

Plumb AA, Halligan S, Nickerson C, Bassett P, Goddard AF, Taylor SA, Patnick J, Burling D. Use of CT colonography in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut. 2014 Jun;63(6):964-73. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304697. Epub 2013 Aug 16. — View Citation

Plumb AA, Halligan S, Taylor SA, Burling D, Nickerson C, Patnick J. CT colonography in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: national survey of current practice. Clin Radiol. 2013 May;68(5):479-87. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.10.018. Epub 2012 Dec 11. — View Citation

Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, Bossuyt PM, van Ballegooijen M, Nio CY, van de Vijver MJ, Biermann K, Thomeer M, van Leerdam ME, Fockens P, Stoker J, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70283-2. Epub 2011 Nov 15. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Difference in sensitivity between arms Difference in sensitivity between intervention and control groups for detection of colorectal cancer / polyps on CT colonography at the 1 month post-intervention test. One month after intervention
Secondary Difference in sensitivity between intervention and controls for colorectal cancer/ polyps at the 12 month post-training test set (i.e. to test longer-term durability of one-off training supplemented by individualized feedback). Twelve months after intervention
Secondary Difference in specificity between intervention and controls at 1 month. One month after intervention
Secondary Difference in specificity between intervention and controls at 12 months. Twelve months after intervention
Secondary Difference in sensitivity between intervention and controls at 6 months. Six months after intervention
Secondary Difference in specificity between intervention and controls at 6 months. Six months after intervention
Secondary Difference in raw score between the control and intervention arms on the knowledge questions as compared to true answers. 1 month after intervention
Secondary Association between interpretation time and diagnostic performance of radiologists on all test sets. 12 months after intervention and after final test set.
Secondary Characteristics of radiologists performing well versus those that do not. After the final test set at 12 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04552093 - Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump Chemotherapy Combined With Systemic Chemotherapy (PUMP-IT) Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04192565 - A Prospective Investigation of the ColubrisMX ELS System N/A
Completed NCT05178745 - A Prospective Observational Cohort Study Evaluating Resection Rate in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Aflibercept in Combination With FOLFIRI - Observatoire résection
Recruiting NCT03561350 - Detect Microsatellite Instability Status in Blood Sample of Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients by Next-Generation Sequencing
Recruiting NCT06128798 - Effect of Preoperative Immunonutrition Versus Standard Oral Nutrition in Patient Undergoing Colorectal Surgery. N/A
Recruiting NCT03602677 - Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging in Prevention of Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage N/A
Completed NCT03631407 - Safety and Efficacy of Vicriviroc (MK-7690) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants With Advanced/Metastatic Microsatellite Stable (MSS) Colorectal Cancer (CRC) (MK-7690-046) Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT04192929 - Chromoendoscopy or Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) for Improving Adenoma Detection in Colonoscopy N/A
Recruiting NCT03042091 - Neomycin and Metronidazole Hydrochloride With or Without Polyethylene Glycol in Reducing Infection in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery Early Phase 1
Terminated NCT02842580 - De-escalation Chemotherapies Versus Escalation in Non Pre-treated Unresectable Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Phase 2
Completed NCT02889679 - Underwater Resection of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Lesions N/A
Completed NCT02564835 - Effects of Yoga on Cognitive and Immune Function in Colorectal Cancer N/A
Completed NCT02149108 - Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) vs Placebo in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (LUME-Colon 1) Phase 3
Completed NCT02503696 - Sample Collection Study to Evaluate DNA Markers in Subjects With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) N/A
Completed NCT02599103 - The Effects of Various Cooking Oils on Health Related Biomarkers in Healthy Subjects N/A
Completed NCT01719926 - Phase I Platinum Based Chemotherapy Plus Indomethacin Phase 1
Completed NCT01669109 - Hatha Yoga for Patients With Colorectal Cancer N/A
Recruiting NCT01428752 - Study of Prevalence of Colorectal Adenoma in 30- to 49-year-old Subjects With a Family History of Colorectal Cancer N/A
Completed NCT01978717 - General Anesthesia Combined With Epidural Anesthesia Mitigates the Surgical Stress-related Immunosuppression in Patients With Colorectal Cancer N/A
Completed NCT01877018 - Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care N/A