View clinical trials related to Cirrhosis.
Filter by:Cirrhosis is a progressive developing liver disease transforming normal hepatocytes into scar tissue with loss of function.The prevalence of cirrhosis has approximately tripled over the past two decades. With the increasing incidence of chronic liver disease, about 2 million people died from cirrhosis worldwide. Currently, D'Amico stage classification and Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores constitute the best tools to predict mortality in patients with Cirrhosis; however, one of their main limitations is the lack of evaluation of the nutritional and functional status. Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease (ESLD) have reduced nutritional intake, hypermetabolism, increased energy expenditure, impaired fasting adaptability, decreased hepatic glycogen reserves, and increased consumption of protein as the main energy donor that often lead to malnutrition, therefore, malnutrition is one of the most common complications in patients with Cirrhosis, is closely related to the increase in morbidity and mortality. Moreover, malnutrition is closely related to the high incidence of infection, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome, and is an independent risk factor affecting the survival rate of patients with End-Stage Liver Disease, including liver transplantation. Therefore, malnutrition should be treated as equally important complications such as ascites and hepatic encephalopathy, and accurate screening, evaluation and appropriate nutritional intervention measures should be taken to improve the prognosis of patients with Cirrhosis. This study aims to establish a nomogram model about nutritional factors to predict the prognosis of patients with Cirrhosis, verify and optimize the model, through the establishment of the model, to more comprehensively evaluate and predict the prognosis of patients with Cirrhosis from the perspective of nutrition, to provide sufficient basis and lay a solid foundation for further nutritional intervention and improve patient prognosis.
The hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a significant global public health concern. The hepatitis A virus is transmitted primarily by the faecal-oral route, leading to acute hepatitis. Symptoms include low-grade fever, anorexia, jaundice, and typically resolve without complications. However, HAV infection in patients with chronic liver disease, especially those over 50 years old, may result in more severe outcomes, including fulminant hepatitis, with a higher mortality rate compared to the general population HAV vaccination is a cornerstone of prevention, especially in high-risk groups. Currently, there is a recommendation to vaccinate patients with chronic liver disease against HAV infection. However, these patients often have compromised immune responses, leading to lower vaccine efficacy compared to the general population. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of the standard 2-dose (0, 6 months) hepatitis A vaccination regimen with an intensive 3-dose (0, 1, 6 months) schedule in patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Compared the seroconversion rate of the standard 2-dose (0, 6 months) hepatitis A vaccination regimen versus the intensive 3-dose (0, 1, 6 months) hepatitis A vaccination regimen in patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. - Compared the antibody levels against the hepatitis A virus (Anti-HAV IgG) of the standard 2-dose (0, 6 months) hepatitis A vaccination regimen versus the intensive 3-dose (0, 1, 6 months) hepatitis A vaccination regimen in patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.
Portal hypertension (PHT) is the main consequence of advanced chronic liver diseases (ACLD) and is often associated with severe complications leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Currently, the gold standard for the evaluation of the severity of PHT is the hepatic venous-pressure gradient (HVPG). The disadvantage of using the HVPG, besides the availability of the technique only in referral centres, is in the case of patients with vascular liver disorders because the HVPG underestimates the severity of PHT. Recent studies have evaluated the feasibility of the pressure gradient measurement through endoscopic transgastric and transhepatic access using special kit with a 25-gauge FNA needle (Cook Medical, Winston-Salem, NC, USA) and a compact manometer (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind, USA) that has the disadvantage of high purchase cost, no tracing of pressure possible and has not yet been properly correlated with the gold standard HVPG measurement or PPG measurement thus limiting its use in current practice. The aim of the study is 1. to assess and compare the correlations in the porto-systemic gradient measurement between a) direct portal vein puncture during TIPS insertion, b) direct portal and hepatic pressure measurements using a 22 Gauge FNA needle during endoscopic ultrasound procedure and c) indirect portal vein pressure measurements using the interventional radiology based hepatic HVPG procedure in patients with cirrhosis submitted to TIPS procedure for complications of portal hypertension and 2. To evaluate and compare the porto-systemic gradient obtained by direct portal and hepatic pressure measurements using a 22 Gauge FNA needle during endoscopic ultrasound and indirect measurement through HVPG measuring in patients with presinusoidal hypertension and those with portal vein thrombosis.
How to construct a novel, non-invasive, accurate, and convenient method to achieve prediction of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is an important general problem in the management of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. We plan to compare the ability of three demensional-magnetic resonance elastography (3D-MRE) to two demensional-magnetic resonance elastography (2D-MRE) to establish a risk stratification system and perform tailored management for portal hypertension in cirrhosis.
Physical frailty and malnutrition are important factors in morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. No study has assessed the validity of Liver Frailty Index (LFI) against reference measures such as maximal lower limb strength. Main objective: To assess the association between LFI score and isometric maximal lower limb strength (quadriceps) in patients with cirrhosis.
According to the WHO, pain is an "unpleasant sensory and emotional experience, linked to existing or potential tissue damage, or described in terms suggestive of such damage". It is a legal obligation to evaluate and take care of it (law of 03/04/2022). However, there are still areas where this is not addressed, particularly in cirrhotic patients (Piano V et al. 2023). The global prevalence of cirrhosis increased by 74.53% between 1990 and 2017 (Liu YB et al, 2022, INSERM France file and Zhai M et al. 2021). In France, the prevalence of cirrhosis is estimated to be 200,000 patients (Cohorte Constances 2017; Serfaty 2019). The causes are varied: toxic (alcohol), viral (hepatitis B, C, HIV), genetic (hemochromatosis, primary biliary cirrhosis) but also iatrogenic or linked to a metabolic syndrome, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The first symptoms of cirrhosis are fatigue, loss of appetite and weight, nausea and vomiting, discomfort and abdominal pain. More serious symptoms may appear such as depression, confusion, sleep disturbances, edema of the lower limbs, ascites, severe pruritus or jaundice. All of these symptoms can be the cause of the pain. However, to date, there are no studies in France on the epidemiology of pain in patients with cirrhosis (Piano V et al. 2023, Klinge M, et al, 2018). To evaluate the prevalence of pain in cirrhotic patients hospitalized at the Center Hospitalier de la Dracénie in Draguignan. Patients hospitalized at the Dracénie CH with a diagnosis of cirrhosis in its patients will be identified in the various departments by a referring doctor who will have to contact Dr PIANO. The latter, as investigating doctor, will then be able to select the patients meeting the inclusion criteria of the protocol and the informants of the existence of the research. He will explain the study to them in detail, give them sufficient time for reflection before obtaining their oral agreement and giving them the information-no-opposition letter. The research will require a single consultation lasting between 15 and 45 minutes. During the visit, the patient will be asked whether or not they are experiencing pain.
Hypothesis: Improvement in cognitive dysfunction with IV albumin in patients with cirrhosis with prior HE and MHE lasts for several weeks after albumin infusion has ended, and is due to persistent improvement in inflammatory markers, endothelial dysfunction, albumin function and gut microbial changes. This will be a single-arm, single-blind sequential trial of IV 25% albumin and IV saline over 8 weeks with biological sampling and cognitive and health related quality of life (HRQOL) testing with each subject acting as their own control.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about dental evaluation and periodontal cleaning along with scheduled follow -up on the dental health and overall health of patients with cirrhosis and also to determine what barrier(s) if any exist to improve oral health in this population.
This is a single-site prospective study to describe efficacy endpoints of single agent memantine in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic HCC otherwise not deemed candidates for intensive systemic therapy. In addition to the primary endpoint and multiple secondary efficacy endpoints, we will describe changes in quality of life on treatment over time.
The goal of this pilot, randomized, single-blind clinical trial is to estimate the effect size of a high and low mean arterial pressure (MAP)-target algorithm among cirrhosis patients hospitalized with acute kidney injury. The main aims to answer are: • Does an algorithm that has low (<80 mmHg) and high (≥80) MAP-targets lead to significant differences in mean arterial pressure? • Are there any serious adverse events (e.g., ischemia) in a high blood pressure algorithm as compared to a low blood pressure algorithm? • Are there any differences in the incidence of AKI reversal in the high v. low MAP-target groups? Participants will be: 1) Randomized to a clinical algorithm that will either target a low (<80 mmHg) or high (≥80 mmHg) MAP. 2) Depending on their group, investigators will titrate commonly used medications to a specific MAP target. Researchers will compare the high and low MAP-target groups to see if these algorithms lead to significant changes in MAP, if they have any impact on AKI reversal, and if there are any adverse events in the high MAP-target group.