Clinical Trials Logo

Chronic Pain Post-Procedural clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Chronic Pain Post-Procedural.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04209868 Recruiting - Anesthesia, Local Clinical Trials

Preoperative Paravertebral Block in Cancer Surgery of the Lung

ParaSOL
Start date: February 1, 2019
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The investigators aim to determine whether ultrasound-guided preemptive paravertebral blockade (PVB) local anaesthetic (pre-PVB LA), administered in addition to the post-operative PVB (post-PVB) local anaesthetic (LA) infusion, reduces acute postoperative pain, opioid requirement, chronic pain, and improves surgical recovery, in thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

NCT ID: NCT04138329 Completed - Clinical trials for Chronic Pain Post-Procedural

Comparison of Postoperative Inguinal Pain Between the Onstep Technique and the Lichtenstein Technique

Start date: September 15, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a randomized, double blind, controlled study. The aim is to compare postoperative inguinal pain using the Inguinal Pain Questionnaire (IPQ) validated in Spanish and Numerical Pain Scale in postoperative patients with Lichtenstein and Onstep technique at 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months. The investigators also validated the IPQ in spanish. It was randomized 20 patients for the Lichtenstein repair and 20 patients for the Onstep technique. The study was conducted in the General Surgery Department of the Central Hospital Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto, considered as a second level of attention and a surgery training center. The validated questionnaire in spanish and the visual pain scale were applied in the office at 1 week and by phone at 1 month, 3 and 6 months after surgery by two evaluators who did not know the surgical technique used.

NCT ID: NCT04020211 Terminated - Clinical trials for Chronic Pain Post-Procedural

HF10 Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain

CPSP-3
Start date: March 14, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This is a multi-center study where patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be treated with HF10 therapy for their chronic knee pain post-orthopedic surgery. The primary endpoint will be assessed at 3 months, but observational assessments will continue until study completion at 12 months following implant.

NCT ID: NCT03986866 Completed - Opioid Use Clinical Trials

Video-based, Patient-Focused Opioid Education in the Perioperative Period

Start date: April 29, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a pilot study designed to assess the feasibility of using a novel, video-based opioid education tool for opioid naïve ambulatory surgery patients in the perioperative period.

NCT ID: NCT03451695 Completed - Clinical trials for Chronic Pain Post-Procedural

Effect of Intrathecal Morphine on Chronic Pain After Elective Caesarean Section

Start date: April 1, 2018
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The incidence of chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) after caesarean section (CS) is reported to be as high as 18%, reflecting it to be a significant clinical problem. Studies related to prevention of progression of acute post-CS pain to its chronicity are sparse. Current guidelines on post-CS analgesia recommend the use of intrathecal (IT) opioids to spinal anaesthesia for improved post-CS pain relief. Despite its frequent use, studies related to the IT morphine use and its association with post-CS chronic pain are lacking. A recent prospective observation study revealed a significant reduction in persistent pain after CS when IT morphine was used as an adjuvant to spinal anaesthesia. However, there is no any randomized controlled trial (RCT) that has explored this association to date. We hypothesized that spinal morphine would reduce the incidence of persistent pain after CS.

NCT ID: NCT03448913 Completed - Clinical trials for Chronic Pain Post-Procedural

Block REducing Pain After Surgery Trial

BREAST
Start date: February 1, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This observational study evaluates difference in chronic pain after six months from surgery between patients who received PECS block and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia alone.

NCT ID: NCT03119896 Completed - Chronic Pain Clinical Trials

Supporting Self-management of Chronic Pain

Start date: August 28, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Does the Navigator Tool Intervention improve communication regarding self-management during consultations between healthcare professionals and people with chronic pain? As there is usually no cure for chronic pain, healthcare professionals are increasingly turning to methods of treatment that emphasise management of symptoms rather than elimination of pain. However, as Pain Concern's previous research has shown, there are several barriers to self-management that both healthcare professionals and people with pain face in their consultations in primary care. The Navigator Tool Intervention has been designed to overcome the majority of these barriers through improving the quality of communication regarding self-management during consultations. In line with the House of Care Model, where care relies on engaged and informed patients, healthcare professionals committed to partnership working, and organisational processes that support this, our intervention prepares both the healthcare professionals and patients for their consultation. By providing a training session for the healthcare professionals in how supported self-management can be brought into the consultation room, and by providing the patients with a paper-based tool that allows them to organise their concerns and questions prior to the consultation, the intervention aims to steer the conversation toward the aspects that the patient needs to discuss in order to better manage their pain. This study will launch the intervention and evaluate its effectiveness in improving self-management support through conversation. It will be launched over a 3 month period in 4 sites across Scotland; 24 patients will be using the tool with a trained healthcare professional and 24 will act as a control group, receiving standard care without the tool. Questionnaires assessing the satisfaction with the consultation(s) and communication, as well as confidence in managing one's pain, will be analysed and compared between the two groups. Interviews will be carried out with healthcare professionals and a sample of patients having used the tool to gain a deeper understanding of the usefulness of the intervention and how it may be improved in the future.