View clinical trials related to Carotid Artery Stenosis.
Filter by:Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability worldwide. The cause is usually either a blockage or a severe narrowing of a cerebral artery. An important part of stroke prevention is the diagnosis and clarification of stenosis in the arteries supplying the brain, both inside and outside the skull, in order to diagnose a high-grade stenosis at an early stage and offer the patient revascularization. In particular, asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis confronts the diagnosing physician with the question of whether revascularisation is necessary. Risk factors for stroke in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis include contralateral TIA or cerebral infarction, male gender, rapid progression of the degree of stenosis, plaque morphology, clinically silent cerebral infarctions, Doppler sonographic evidence of microemboli or reduced vasomotor reserve. An established biomarker does not exist at this time. A candidate for such a biomarker in the blood is the protein "neurofilament light chain" (NFL), which is already established in the diagnosis of dementia. As a component of the cytoskeleton of neurons, it is released into the patient's blood when the cells are damaged and can be measured there. Another candidate is glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP), a part of the cytoskeleton of glial cells that is also released into the blood when glial cells are damaged. A systematic investigation of the value of neurofilament light chain and the glial fibrillary acidic protein in the blood of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis is still lacking. VANGAS determines the value of NFL and GFAP from the blood of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis to determine associations with the degree of stenosis, the natural course of the stenosis (increase or decrease) and possible symptoms of the stenosis as well as the functional outcome after symptomatic stenosis.
Objective: To evaluate the technical performance of a novel cascaded wave imaging technique compared to plane wave imaging for blood flow imaging in patients with and without carotid artery stenosis. Study design: Observational, feasibility study in a total of 10 patients with and 10 patients without a visible carotid artery plaque. Intervention (observational): all participants will undergo a carotid ultrasound measurement including conventional duplex ultrasound and ultrasound based flow imaging using plane waves and cascaded waves.
The purpose of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in patients with carotid artery stenosis receiving carotid endarterectomy.
RECAS is a prospective cohort of 1,000 patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and undergoing revascularization therapy or standard medication treatment alone. The goal of this study is to validate whether CAS revascularization when compared to standard medication treatment alone, can effectively reduce the progression of Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) burden, as well as improve the severity of retinal pathologies and cognitive impairment. Therefore, Patients aged ≥ 40 years have more than 50% stenosis in unilateral carotid artery and sign informed consent will be recruited. In this study, patients will be asked to undergo Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA)/ Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA), Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP),multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) and neuropsychological testing. Estimated follow-up can be up to 10 years.
Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) was initially described as a clinical syndrome following carotid endarterectomy (CEA), but it may present in both CEA and carotid artery stenting, and is characterised by throbbing ipsilateral frontotemporal or periorbital headache, and sometimes diffuse headache, eye and face pain, vomiting, confusion, macular oedema, and visual disturbances, focal motor seizures with frequent secondary generalisation, focal neurological deficits, and intracerebral or subarachnoid haemorrhage. Knowledge of CHS among physicians is limited. Most studies report incidences of CHS of 1-3% after carotid endarterectomy. CHS is most common in patients with increases of more than 100% in perfusion compared with baseline after carotid revascularization procedures and is rare in patients with increases in perfusion less than 100% compared with baseline. The pathophysiological mechanism of CHS remains only partially understood. The chronic lowflow state induced by severe carotid disease results in a compensatory dilation of cerebral vessels distal to the stenosis, as part of the normal autoregulatory response, to maintain adequate cerebral blood flow (CBF). In this chronically dilated state, the vessels lose their ability to autoregulate vascular resistance in response to changes in blood pressure. In fact, it has been shown that this dysautoregulation is proportional to the duration and severity of chronic hypoperfusion. After revascularization and reperfusion, the impaired cerebral autoregulation could then contribute to a cascade of intracranial microcirculatory changes, as explained above, with an inability of reaction toward the augmentation of the CBF after the carotid recanalization. Although most patients have mild symptoms and signs, progression to severe and life-threatening symptoms can occur if CHS is not recognised and treated adequately. Because CHS is a diagnosis based on several non-specific signs and symptoms, patients may be misdiagnosed as having one of the better-known causes of perioperative complications like thromboembolism.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about how to utilize multiple evaluation techniques in carotid artery stenosis patients for optimizing assessment of diagnosis and treatment strategy. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Identify best strategy that use multi-modal MRI and CT to assess patients' cerebral lesions and perfusion. - Identify best strategy that use multi-modal MRI, PET-MRI ultrasound and CT to assess components and characters of patients' carotid plaques. Participants will accept imaging examination before and after surgery. And doctors will collect basic characteristics, imaging results and biological samples of patients for analysis.
Evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Timing Carotid Stent for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in patients.
The majority (>80%) of strokes are of ischemic etiology, of which ≈15% to 20% are attributable to atherosclerosis of the extracranial carotid arteries. The primary goal in carotid artery revascularization is to prevent stroke in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Treatment options including carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). Hence, the investigators aim to compare carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in terms of long-term prognostic endpoints. Also, CEA and CAS result in different postoperative geometric features of carotid arteries that entail relevant modifications of rheological parameters, that may be associated with the risk of local complications and carotid artery restenosis. Finally, long-term and sustained cognitive benefits after carotid artery revascularization need further research and evidence.
The purpose of this research study is to understand how radiation therapy may affect blood vessels in the neck called the carotid arteries. Investigators want to look at narrowing of the artery or thickening of the walls of the arteries.
This is a prospective study aimed to explore the changes of cognitive function after surgery for CAS and the correlation with brain connectivity, in order to look for the clinical biomarkers to predict the carotid stent implantation for patients which can effect the cognition