Clinical Trials Logo

Arterial Ischemic Stroke clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Arterial Ischemic Stroke.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06040255 Enrolling by invitation - Arteriopathy Clinical Trials

Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy Steroid Trial

FOCAS
Start date: October 1, 2023
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This comparative effectiveness trial (CET) in children with suspected focal cerebral arteriopathy (FCA) presenting with arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) will compare the use of early corticosteroid treatment (Arm A) versus delayed/no corticosteroid treatment (Arm B). Delayed corticosteroid treatment is given only for those demonstrating disease progression and is initiated as soon as the progression is detected (at any time after randomization). All participants will also receive standard of care therapy (aspirin and supportive care). Sites will randomize participants 1:1 to Arm A or B. Participants will be enrolled and randomized as soon as possible after their stroke/TIA up until 96 hours following the initial stroke/TIA event.

NCT ID: NCT04962503 Completed - Clinical trials for Arterial Ischemic Stroke

A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate the Safety of Afamelanotide in Patients With Acute Arterial Ischaemic Stroke (AIS)

Start date: June 3, 2021
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The primary study objective is to assess the safety of afamelanotide while the secondary objective is to assess whether the therapy affects the size of the penumbra, by increasing blood flow, restoring oxygen supply to the brain, and reducing the amount of cerebral oedema (fluid) which is seen as a result of the stroke. Positive findings would indicate that the drug is able to support brain tissue-at-risk and provide overall neuroprotection and benefit to stroke patients.

NCT ID: NCT03887143 Completed - Clinical trials for Arterial Ischemic Stroke

National Retrospective Study Of Recanalization Treatments In Pediatric Arterial Ischemic Stroke

KID-CLOT
Start date: April 4, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this study is to evaluate recanalization treatments use, safety and efficacy at the acute phase of arterial ischemic stroke in pediatric patients

NCT ID: NCT03249844 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Arterial Ischemic Stroke

Paediatric Arteriopathy Steroid Aspirin Project

PASTA
Start date: September 1, 2022
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) is a devastating condition, affecting 1.6-5/100,000 children/year. Although their outcome is different, children with stroke do not recover better than adults, with at least 2/3 suffering long term sequels such as developmental (motor, global intellectual, language...) and behavioral disabilities, epilepsy, and low adaptative and academic skills... Stenotic cerebral arteriopathy is identified as AIS etiology in 60-80% of previously healthy children and the course of this arteriopathy is the strongest predictor of recurrent events. 30-40% of these children have a focal unilateral cerebral arteriopathy (FCA). Childhood FCA is suspected to be an inflammatory vessel wall pathology triggered by varicella and other (viral) infections. As recurrences occur for the great majority in the first 6 months after the index event, aspirin 5 mg/kg/day is recommended for at least 18 months to 2 years. As there is a rational for using immunomodulatory drugs at the acute stage of FCA, immunotherapies are currently used by neuropaediatricians in AIS, mainly as steroids for children with stenosing arteriopathies. However, due to weak evidences, the literature cannot either encourage or discourage this practice. The long term course of children with FCA is only approach to date by retrospective studies and controversies about outcome remain (for example, the recurrence risk on antithrombotic treatment varies notably from quasi zero to 25%). And finally, it is shown in childhood stroke, as well as in the global field of longstanding impairment, that parental and medical points of view do not match consistently. Longitudinal studies are needed to deserve this familial approach.