Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The role of operative fixation of unstable, displaced lateral malleolus fractures is well-established (Mayer, Mak, and Yablon). However, the optimal type of fixation remains the subject of debate. Lag screw fixation alone is only appropriate for long oblique fractures in younger patients (Tornetta). For all other patients, the choices for fibular stabilization most commonly involve the use of plates and screws which can be placed on either the lateral or posterior side of the bone, with or without lag screws. Lateral plating remains the most popular option, but since the description of posterior plating in 1982 (Brunner), reports in the literature have demonstrated some advantages of posterior over lateral plating (Ostrum, Treadwell, Winkler, and Wissing) . These advantages include less dissection, less palpable hardware, and decreased likelihood of intra-articular screw placement. However, there is only a single retrospective study in the published literature directly comparing these two methods (Lamontagne).


Clinical Trial Description

Since it was first described in 1982, posterior antiglide plating has been presented as an attractive alternative to lateral plating of distal fibula fractures. Biomechanical studies have shown it to be a stronger construct than lateral plating, and other purported advantages include less dissection, decreased potential for intra-articular screw placement, and less palpable hardware decreasing the need for hardware removal.However, although posterior plating has become an accepted technique for operative management of these injuries, there is little clinical information in the literature regarding this treatment, and only one published retrospective study directly comparing posterior to lateral plating.

In 1996, Ostrum published a prospective study evaluating posterior plating in 32 patients, but only compared his results to a cohort of patients treated with lateral plating that was not part of his actual study group.Patel et al. recently presented a retrospective comparison of both techniques, but their study only included 29 patients in the lateral plating group and 23 in the posterior group.In both these studies, posterior plating was felt to be superior to lateral plating based on both the decrease in complications/re-operations related to symptomatic hardware, and improved function and pain scores.

However, in a much larger study, Lamontagneet al. showed no differences in operative time, complications or hardware removal rates in 193 patients reviewed retrospectively, and concluded that they could not recommend one treatment method over the other. They even elected not to proceed with a planned prospective study based on their results.A recent retrospective analysis of 70 patients showed a 43% incidence of need for hardware removal due to pain, with 30% of these patients having peroneal tendon lesions identified intra-operatively. ;


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Bio-equivalence Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT00718302
Study type Interventional
Source Boston Medical Center
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date June 2008
Completion date December 2012

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT05009342 - Evaluation of Functional Outcomes at 2 Months According to Therapeutic Management, in Trauma With Low-grade Osteo-ligamentous Ankle Injury in Children N/A
Completed NCT04367532 - Foam Rolling and Tissue Flossing of the Cuff Muscles N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05484778 - Analysis of Balance and Functional Hop Tests Used for Return to Sports in Athletes With Lower Extremity Injuries by Dual Task Study N/A
Completed NCT02609308 - Lateral Ankle Sprain and Platelet Rich Plasma N/A
Recruiting NCT01196338 - Early Weightbearing and Mobilization Versus Non-Weightbearing and Mobilization in Unstable Ankle Fractures N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT01205841 - A Prospective Study Comparing Different Clinical Decision Rules in Adult and Pediatric Ankle Trauma N/A
Recruiting NCT05916300 - Diagnostic Ultrasonography in Physiotherapy
Completed NCT06041243 - Effects of Progressive Exercise Method Using Balance Board in Recreational Athletes With Functional Ankle Instability N/A
Completed NCT04302961 - Effects of Gait Retraining With Auditory Feedback Early Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04493645 - Ankle Instability Using Foot Intensive Rehabilitation N/A
Completed NCT02276339 - Muscle Activation in Chronic Ankle Instability and the Effect of an Exercise Programme N/A
Recruiting NCT06086418 - Perineural Dexamethasone on the Duration of Popliteal Nerve Block for Anesthesia After Pediatric Ankle Surgery Phase 4
Completed NCT05074511 - Weight Variations Impacts on the Ankle of the Child
Completed NCT05130372 - Comparison of The Acute Effects of Different Stretching Methods on Ankle Joint Range In Healty Older Adults N/A
Completed NCT01945034 - 5% Topical Ibuprofen (IBU) for Ankle Sprain Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05729542 - Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Suture Button Versus Fibulink Fixation for Acute Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06086223 - Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy N/A
Completed NCT05538845 - Comparison of Screw and Suture Button Technique Results in Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries
Not yet recruiting NCT02705690 - Benchmarking the iOS Balance Application Against the Berg Balance Test N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03049423 - MRI Appearance of Injured Ligament and Tendon of the Ankle in Different Postures N/A