Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Stress induced by pain and anxiety is common in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients and can impede the delivery of care as well as their recovery. Sedation/analgesia in PICU is usually achieved using narcotics and benzodiazepines. Excessive use of these drugs can put patients at risk for hemodynamic and respiratory instability, prolonged mechanical ventilation, withdrawal symptoms, and delirium. Non-pharmacologic measures for analgesia and anxiolysis may reduce the total medication requirement and their side effects. The use of non-pharmacologic interventions, including music, has been recommended by sedation guidelines for critically ill patients; however, it is not clear how these interventions should be provided. We plan to conduct a pilot 3-arm RCT to determine the feasibility of a music intervention and assess its effects on sedation/analgesia requirements in children admitted to PICU. Children will be randomly assigned to receive music, noise cancellation or control. Music will be delivered by headphones and an iPod. Music will consist on classical music selected by the study's pediatric music therapist. The noise cancellation group will receive the same headphones but without music. Clinical care of the participants, including use of sedation and analgesia drugs, will not be protocolized. Primary outcomes of this pilot trial is feasibility. Secondary outcomes are drug requirements for sedation and analgesia, and incidence of delirium. These requirements will be captured as a daily intensity score and intermittent dose (PRN) frequency. Mixed-effects models will be used to analyze the effect of the music on sedation/analgesia requirements.


Clinical Trial Description

Aim and Objectives Overall Research Question Does music reduce sedation requirements in critically ill children? Purpose statement We plan to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the feasibility of a pediatric music medicine trial, and to study the effects of music on sedation requirements in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Objectives: a) To demonstrate the feasibility of a music RCT in pediatric critical care; b) To estimate the effect of music on the sedation requirements of critically ill children; c) to obtain information about standard deviation and mean treatment effect for future sample size calculation for a larger trial.

Hypothesis:

We hypothesize that: a) A RCT of music in critically ill children will be feasible; b) Music will result in a 20 % reduction in sedation requirements.

Methodology Study design: We propose a pilot 3 arm RCT. Randomization will be done by a computer-based program to ensure allocation concealment. A total of 30 patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive music, noise cancellation or control.

Setting: Pediatric Intensive Care Units (Cardiac and General) at the Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta.

Study Population: critically ill children on mechanical ventilation and receiving sedation and/or analgesia.

Intervention After consent and randomization, patients will be started on the assigned intervention (music/noise cancellation/control) 24-48 hours after admission to the PICU. Based on the neonatal and adult studies, in the music and noise cancellation groups the intervention will be delivered during 30 minutes, at least 3 times a day. The control group will receive usual care. Music will be delivered with the use of noise cancellation headphones and an iPod touch (Apple, California). Music selection will be chosen based on the patient's age. Classical music has been selected by a pediatric music therapist based on its observed properties to settle and calm children. In the noise cancellation group the intervention will be provided with the same headphones connected to an iPod with a silent recording. Children will be assessed with the Sedation behavior scale (SBS) before and during the intervention.29 Signs of agitation or an increase in the SBS will indicate failure of the intervention. Patients will remain on protocol for a maximum of 7 days as long as they are on invasive mechanical ventilation. A parent survey will be conducted at the end of the study. This survey will be conducted on paper or electronically (REDCap, Research Electronic Data Capture) as per the parents' preference.

Concomitant interventions: Clinical care will not be protocolized, and will be according to usual care. Sedative administration will not be directed by the study protocol; it will be up to the attending PICU physician. Assessment of the patients' sedation status and withdrawal symptoms will be conducted every 6 hours by the bedside nurse. Sedation status will be assessed with the use of the SBS while withdrawal will be assessed with the Withdrawal Assessment Tool (WAT-1) score; both are well validated tools .29-32 Demographic variables: To assess if the groups are comparable, including known risk factors, we will record the following: demographic variables (sex, weight, age, diagnosis, operative status, Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score, inotrope score, Paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score, baseline SBS, invasive procedures, presence of invasive lines and tubes).

Outcome variables: Feasibility, sedation requirements and delirium. Adverse events Adverse events such as significant negative change in vital signs and/or any other sign of intolerance (agitation) to the intervention will be recorded. We will also record any skin or ear problems (pressure injuries) thought to be associated with the use of headphones.

Study procedures: Patients admitted to the Stollery Children's Hospital PICU and needing mechanical ventilation will be screened for eligibility and approached for consent. After consent, patient demographics will be recorded. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to the music, the noise cancellation or the control group. During randomization we will stratify patients by age. As a patient qualifies for the trial, a study number and a randomization number will be assigned. Based on the randomization code the research nurse will proceed with one of the interventions, or control, as described above.

Masking: The research nurse will provide the iPods with music or silent recording based on group allocation and will not disclose this information to the healthcare team or the family. However, it is impossible to blind the use of headphones vs. control. The statistician analyzing the data will be blinded to the group allocation.

Sample size justification: The primary outcome used to determine sample size for a future larger RCT is daily Sedation Intensity Score (SIS). The minimal clinically important difference determined by our survey is a reduction in sedation requirements of 20%.8 This pilot study including 10 patients in each group (total 30 patients) will allow us to obtain pediatric information to calculate a sample size for the larger trial.

Analysis Baseline characteristics will be analyzed by descriptive methods. Analysis will be conducted on intention to treat basis and as per protocol. Mixed-effects models will be used to analyze the primary effect of the music on sedation requirements. Statistical tests will be 2-sided with 0.05 level of significance.

Data collection: Variables will be recorded in an anonymized database using REDCap, Research Electronic Data Capture.34

Expected outcomes and Impact This pilot study is a necessary first step toward the conduct of a larger music trial in critically ill children. To obtain funding from major agencies we need to demonstrate the tolerability and feasibility of the intervention and patient recruitment at our centre. This pilot study will also allow formal sample size calculation for a larger trial and will allow us to obtain feedback from major stakeholders including families. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03497559
Study type Interventional
Source University of Alberta
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date March 30, 2018
Completion date April 30, 2019

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05534230 - Dexmedetomidine for Pain Reduction in CABG N/A
Recruiting NCT06275698 - HONEY for the Treatment of POst-Tonsillectomy Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT04436224 - Hydromorphone for ICU-analgesia in Patients With Non-mechanical Ventilation Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT04548323 - Hypoalgesic Effects of Walking and Running Imagined
Completed NCT06054945 - Clinical Impact of IPACK Block Addition to Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block
Completed NCT04394481 - Extension of Analgesia by Combined Injection of Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Phase 4
Completed NCT04690647 - The Efficacy of Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Analgesia After Elective Total Hip Replacement. N/A
Completed NCT05034601 - ESPB vs TPVB for Postoperative Analgesia After the Nuss Procedure N/A
Completed NCT03740815 - Feasibility of Serratus Plane Block Associated With Sedation in Axillary Dissection N/A
Recruiting NCT05454202 - Assessment of the Interest of ANI in the Non-communicating Patient in Palliative Care
Recruiting NCT04554186 - Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block. N/A
Suspended NCT04860635 - Safety of F14 Following Total Knee Replacement Phase 2/Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT04519463 - The Effect of Local Anesthesia With Lidocaine During Insertion and Removal of Nasal Packing Early Phase 1
Completed NCT02916342 - Interscalene Block Versus Combined Supraprascapular: Axillary Nerve Blocks Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT02549118 - Tenoxicam for Intrapartum Analgesia Phase 2
Completed NCT03206554 - Local Infiltration Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT02190760 - Comparison Between Perineural and Systemic Effect of Dexamethasone for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block. N/A
Completed NCT01789606 - Self-Selection and Actual Use Trial of Ibuprofen 600 mg Immediate Release/Extended Caplet Phase 3
Completed NCT01299584 - ULTIVA Post Marketing Surveillance N/A
Completed NCT00137085 - Ketamine Versus Fentanyl as an Adjunct to Propofol-Assisted Emergency Department Procedural Sedation N/A