Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Block Graft Versus Autogenous Bone Block Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation

Alveolar Bone Loss Clinical Trial

Official title:

The Effect of Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Block Graft Versus Autogenous Bone Block Graft on Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05347017
• Other study ID #: perio2022april
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: June 2022
• Est. completion date: July 2023

Study information

• Verified date: April 2022
• Source: Cairo University
• Contact: Mohamed Talaat, Master Degree
• Phone: +201009174617
• Email: Mohamed.Talaat[@]dentistry.cu.edu.eg
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this trial is to compare the effect of autogenous demineralized dentin block graft (ADDBG) versus autogenous bone block graft (ABBG) harvested from maxillary tuberosity on alveolar ridge preservation after extraction of non-restorable single rooted teeth

Description:

Many studies have reported an approximately 50% reduction in alveolar bone both the horizontal and vertical directions over 12 months with more than two-thirds of the reduction occurring in the first three months after extraction. Alveolar ridge preservation is a procedure that attempts to reduce bone dimensional changes that naturally take place following tooth extraction. A broadly recognized approach is the maintenance of bone walls through bone substitute (graft) delivery into the socket, where guided bone regeneration may be a requisite. Autogenous bone graft has osteogenic and osteoinductive effect. however, when attempts were made to use autologous bone chips in socket preservation, they failed to promote healing or stimulate hard tissue formation in the socket. On the other hand, autogenous bone block graft from the tuberosity has shown a feasible, user-friendly, low-cost solution for minimizing soft and hard tissue collapse and dimensional loss following single-rooted tooth extraction.

Moreover, root dentin block is composed of Type I collagen matrix with several osteoinductive non-collagenous proteins such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) and dentin matrix proteins. Geometrically, alveolar bone morphology was maintained by dentin block graft as well as it has micropores (dentinal tubules) of 3-5 μm diameter and macropores of 0.2-0.3 mm diameter for enhancing osteoinductive and osteoconductive functions.

Both demineralized dentin block and autogenous bone block grafts has been utilized for alveolar ridge preservation or augmentation but the superiority of one form over the other is not yet clear

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 20
• Est. completion date: July 2023
• Est. primary completion date: January 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 60 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Non-restorable tooth indicated for extraction

• Single-rooted teeth

• Motivated patients, agree to sign informed consent and complete the follow-up period

Exclusion Criteria:

• Pregnant females

• active infection at extraction site

• Smokers

• systemic conditions affecting healing (e.g. diabetes, medications as bisphosphonates...)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Alveolar Bone Loss

Intervention

Procedure:
• Alveolar ridge preservation using autogenous demineralized dentin block graft
Atraumatic extraction of non restorable tooth, then the extracted tooth will be prepared and demineralized by HCL acid and inserted as demineralized dentin block graft in the socket
• Alveolar ridge preservation using autogenous bone block graft
Atraumatic extraction of non restorable tooth, then the autogenous bone block graft will be harvested from the maxillary tuberosity and reshaped and inserted into the socket

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Faculty of dentistry	Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Cairo University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (5)

Barootchi S, Wang HL, Ravida A, Ben Amor F, Riccitiello F, Rengo C, Paz A, Laino L, Marenzi G, Gasparro R, Sammartino G. Ridge preservation techniques to avoid invasive bone reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Naples Consensus Report Working Group C. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019;12(4):399-416. — View Citation

Jung RE, Philipp A, Annen BM, Signorelli L, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jan;40(1):90-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12027. Epub 2012 Nov 19. — View Citation

Kim, Y., Fajardo, K., Valera, A. and Um, I. (2017) 'Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Block For Socket Preservation: A One-Stage Technique', Dentistry, 7(414), pp. 2161-1122.1000414.

Wong RW, Rabie AB. Effect of bio-oss collagen and collagen matrix on bone formation. Open Biomed Eng J. 2010 Mar 9;4:71-6. doi: 10.2174/1874120701004010071. — View Citation

Younes R, Khairallah CM. The "One Piece" Autologous Tuberosity Graft: A Contemporary Concept in Ridge Preservation. Case Rep Dent. 2020 Feb 13;2020:3945076. doi: 10.1155/2020/3945076. eCollection 2020. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Alveolar ridge bucco-lingual width change in mm	Alveolar bone linear width will be measured at baseline and after 6 months using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. The change in bone width will be calculated as the subtraction of final width from baseline width and will be measured in millimetres (Jung et al., 2013)	6 months
Secondary	Alveolar ridge apico-coronal height change in mm	Difference in height linear measurement between baseline and final CBCT scans (Jung et al., 2013); Difference in height linear measurement between baseline and final CBCT scans (Jung et al., 2013); Measures the difference in height linear measurements between baseline and final CBCT scans (Jung et al., 2013)	6 months
Secondary	Histological assessment	Bone samples from control and intervention sites will be taken during implant placement using a trephine bur of a size smaller than the implant. Samples will be examined for new bone formation (Yes/no) and inflammatory response (Yes/no) (Wong and Rabie, 2010).	6 months